Back

The Syncytial Mesh Model: A Biophysical Framework for Scale-Dependent Coherence in the Brain

Ballus Santacana, A.

2025-06-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.11.22.624908 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Large-scale neural coherence and distributed plasticity are fundamental to brain function, yet traditional circuit- and connectome-based models fail to capture stable phase gradients, harmonic resonances, and non-local reorganization observed across spatially disconnected regions. We introduce the Syncytial Mesh Model: a unified, three-layered framework in which a mesh-like substrate--grounded in astrocytic syncytia physiology--operates alongside local circuit and structural connectivity layers. The Syncytial Mesh layer, implemented via a damped wave equation on a small-world astrocytic network, generates traveling waves, interference-driven resonance, and distributed co-activation signals that underpin rare, scale-dependent phase coherence (delta/theta, 1 Hz to 8 Hz) and diffuse plasticity. Numerical simulations--using a 9-point isotropic Laplacian, perfectly matched layer (PML) boundaries, and unified RK4 integration--produce artifact-free amplitude snapshots, radial phase gradients, and precise spectral peaks matching human MEG and LFP data. An analytic two-mode model, fitted to empirical phase-gradient coherence across N = 43 subjects, yields a decoherence rate{lambda} 0 {approx} 1.5903/s, explaining why coherence is negligible at micrometer scales yet plateaus at [~] 4.65 % for millimeter-scale patches. Quantitative comparison with individual spectra shows median Pearson correlation r = 0.917 and median MSE = 26.6 dB2. By embedding the mesh in astrocytic physiology, the Syncytial Mesh Model provides a falsifiable, mechanistically grounded alternative to connectome-centric theories, unifying neural synchrony, resonance, and distributed plasticity across scales.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.