Back

Evidence for Stepwise Disruption of E. coli RNA Polymerase-{lambda}R Promoter Contacts and Bubble Collapse in Transcription Initiation

Rector, M. J.; Li, R.; Wang, H.-C.; Record, M. T.

2024-11-26 biochemistry
10.1101/2024.11.22.624876 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In transcription initiation by E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), translocation of the RNA-DNA hybrid disrupts RNAP-promoter and {sigma}70-core RNAP contacts, releasing {sigma}70 and allowing RNAP to escape. Previously, to investigate whether RNAP-promoter contacts break step-by-step as the hybrid lengthens or concertedly at escape, we determined rate constants and activation energies of nucleotide-incorporation steps involving translocation at the {lambda}PR promoter. Trends in these quantities with hybrid length were inconsistent with concerted models and provided evidence for stepwise disruption of RNAP-promoter contacts and collapse of the upstream bubble (-1 to -11). Here we report kinetic m-values quantifying urea and glycine betaine (GB) effects on rate constants of individual nucleotide-incorporation steps and compare with m-values predicted from structural and model compound information. GB is predicted to favor and urea disfavor binding the initiating NTPs and trigger-helix formation in 2-mer (pppApU) synthesis, largely because of burial of phosphate oxygens in NTP binding and amide oxygens in trigger-helix formation. Consistent with these predictions, GB accelerates and urea retards steps synthesizing 3-mer and 4-mer. However, both solutes retard mid-initiation steps (5-mer to 9-mer synthesis) where -10 contacts are proposed to break, exposing DNA phosphates and allowing the upstream initiation bubble to collapse. Strikingly, urea greatly accelerates while GB retards the 11-mer synthesis step, where -35-contacts are proposed to break, {sigma}70 is released and RNAP escapes. Urea and GB kinetic m-values and activation energies of these steps are inconsistent with concerted models and support a stepwise model of contact disruption and bubble collapse in initiation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 2%
18.3%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.0%
4
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
6
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.2%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.8%
9
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
15
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
16
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
ACS Bio & Med Chem Au
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%