Mechanical stresses govern myoblast fusion and myotube growth
Le Toquin, Y.; Dubey, S.; Ardaseva, A.; Balasubramaniam, L.; Delaune, E.; Morin, V.; Doostmohammadi, A.; Marcelle, C.; Ladoux, B.
10.1101/2024.11.22.624831 bioRxivShow abstract
Myoblast fusion into myotubes is critical for muscle formation, growth and repair. While the cellular and molecular mechanisms regulating myoblast fusion are increasingly understood, the role of biomechanics in this process remains largely unexplored. Here, we reveal that a dynamic feedback loop between evolving cell mechanics and cell-generated stresses shape the fusion of primary myoblasts in vitro. Applying principles from active nematics, we show that myoblast and myotube patterning follows physical rules similar to liquid crystal organization. Remarkably, fusion predominantly occurs at comet-shaped topological defects in cellular alignment, which we identified as regions of high compressive stress. We further find that this stress-driven organization depends on extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, which mirrors the nematic order of the cell population. Our integrated data, supported by active nematics-based mathematical modeling, accurately predict self-organization patterns and mechanical stresses that regulate myoblast fusion. By revealing the essential role of biomechanics and ECM interplay in myogenesis, this work establishes a foundational framework for understanding biomechanical principles in morphogenesis.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Curling of epithelial monolayers reveals coupling between active bending and tissue tension 97%
- Polymerization force-regulated actin filament-Arp23 complex interaction dominates self-adaptive cell migrations 96%
- Two-point optical manipulation reveals mechanosensitive remodeling of cell-cell contacts in vivo 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.