Mobilizing community-driven public health response: increasing access to diagnostic testing for underserved and uninsured individuals in Connecticut through lab-in-a-van partnerships
Choate, B.; Sardana, R.; Mathews, A.; Weirsman, S.; Fajardo, K.; Ali, Y.; Liu, C.; Hui, P.; Schofield, K.; Wyllie, A. L.; Levi, A. W.
Show abstract
BackgroundPartnering with community leaders, we sought to address ongoing diagnostic testing needs in underserved neighborhoods and evaluate whether a saliva-based mobile testing program could help overcome barriers to testing for uninsured and low-income individuals. This is critical as many lack a primary care provider, cannot access reliable health information, or have limited financial resources. MethodsFree saliva-based, SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing was offered at 123 local community events in Connecticut, between June 2023 to July 2024. The SalivaDirect extraction-free RT-qPCR protocol was run on a CLIA licensed van operated by Yale Pathology Labs under FDA Emergency Use Authorization. Testing locations were identified and advertised in partnership with the community. Patient perspectives on approachability, convenience, and usefulness of mobile testing were recorded via REDcap. ResultsApproximately 100 local contacts informed the mobile testing model. Overall, 1,428 individuals participated, with 838 completing a testing experience survey. Of these, 54% identified as Black, Indigenous, People of Color; 59% reported annual household income less than $25,000; 31% were uninsured. Test results were reported in an average 3.1 hours, 48 positive samples were identified. Test takers agreed it was easy to access the van (74%) and felt comfortable (75%); 29% received their first COVID-19 test at the van; 48% were unaware of alternate testing; 44% reported difficulty accessing health care; and 49% identified transportation as a challenge. ConclusionsThis study demonstrated the positive impact mobile testing could have for overcoming barriers to accessing healthcare, and its potential to serve as a framework for managing and responding to future public health needs.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sources of Successful Participant Engagement in a Public Health Research Study: a Focus on a Latino Community 96%
- Feasibility and lessons learned on remote trial implementation from TestBoston, a fully remote, longitudinal, large-scale COVID-19 surveillance study 94%
- Evaluation of a novel community-based COVID-19 'Test-to-Care model' for low-income populations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic testing preferences can help inform future public health response efforts: global insights from an international survey 95%
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 93%
- Comparing in-person, blended and virtual training interventions; a real-world evaluation of HIV capacity building programs in 16 countries in sub-Saharan Africa 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 94%
- Perceptions on undertaking regular asymptomatic self-testing for COVID-19 using lateral flow tests: A qualitative study of university students and staff 94%
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 93%
- Lessons Learned From the Implementation of a Participant-Collected, Mail-Based SARS-CoV-2 Serological Survey in Massachusetts, USA 93%
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Retrospective Case Study of Successful Translational Research: Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment, Experiences in Community Engagement 94%
- Systematic Observation Of COVID-19 Mitigation (Socom): Assessing Face Covering And Distancing In Schools 90%
- A Survey of Individuals’ Willingness to Share Real-World Data Post-Mortem with Researchers 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.