Back

TIRE-seq: an Integrated Sample Extraction and Transcriptomics Workflow for High Throughput Perturbation Studies

O'Keeffe, P.; Nouri, Y.; Saw, H. S.; Moore, Z.; Baldwin, T. M.; Olechnowicz, S. W. Z.; Jabbari, J. S.; Squire, D. M.; Leslie, S.; Wang, C.; You, Y.; Ritchie, M. E.; Cross, R. S.; Jenkins, M. R.; Audiger, C.; Naik, S. H.; Whittle, J. R.; Freytag, S.; Best, S. A.; Hickey, P. F.; Amann-Zalcenstein, D.; Bowden, R.; Brown, D. V.

2024-11-21 genomics
10.1101/2024.11.20.624406 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is widely used in biomedical research, advancing our understanding of gene expression across biological systems. Traditional methods require upstream RNA extraction from biological inputs, adding time and expense to workflows. We developed TIRE-seq (Turbocapture Integrated RNA Expression Sequencing) to address these challenges. TIRE-seq integrates mRNA purification directly into library preparation, eliminating the need for a separate extraction step. This streamlined approach reduces turnaround time, minimizes sample loss, and improves data quality. A comparative study with the widely used Prime-seq protocol demonstrates TIRE-seqs superior sequencing efficiency with crude cell lysates as inputs. TIRE-seqs utility was demonstrated across three biological applications. It captured transcriptional changes in stimulated human T cells, revealing activation-associated gene expression profiles. It also identified key genes driving murine dendritic cell differentiation, providing insights into lineage commitment. Lastly, TIRE-seq analyzed the dose-response and time-course effects of temozolomide on patient-derived neurospheres, identifying differentially expressed genes and enriched pathways linked to the drugs mechanism of action. With its simplified workflow and high sequencing efficiency, TIRE-seq offers a cost-effective solution for large-scale gene expression studies across diverse biological systems.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.