A global analysis of quarantine and isolation policies governing outbreak responses
Rosner, A. M.; Weets, C. M.; Wilson, R.; Katz, R.
Show abstract
IntroductionCountries across the world implemented diverse quarantine and isolation policies throughout the COVID-19 pandemic with varying levels of effectiveness. Their widespread use invites new considerations regarding the effectiveness of domestic quarantine and isolation policies, the ways they are enforced, and the jurisdictions responsible for ordering these measures. MethodsWe systematically analyzed legally-enforceable policies in current standing in each United Nations (UN) member state, assessing the authorities to quarantine and isolate individuals within national borders. We captured the text of each policy and categorized the responsible jurisdictional authority and enforcement mechanisms. ResultsOf UN member states, 91.67% (176/192) had legally-enforceable policies that addressed both quarantine and isolation. Two countries only had quarantine policies, seven only had isolation policies, and seven countries had neither. Jurisdictional quarantine authority was primarily vested in the national level (74.16%; 132/178), with the remainder mixed (22.47%; 40/178) and subnational only (3.37%; 6/178). Isolation authority was also primarily at the national level (69.40%; 127/183) but with a greater proportion mixed (27.87%; 51/183) and subnational only (2.73%; 5/183). Quarantine enforcement mechanisms were codified in a majority of countries (80.91%; 144/178) with nearly all (94.44%; 136/144) enforcing quarantine through monetary fines or incarceration penalties for non-compliant individuals. Isolation enforcement mechanisms were codified in an even greater number of countries (86.89%; 159/183), with 95.51% (149/156) having penalties for non-compliant individuals. ConclusionWe created a novel repository for quarantine and isolation policies to assist in future outbreak responses. We identify specific country-level policy gaps, which can be addressed through epidemic and pandemic preparedness efforts. Finally, the repository provides the necessary evidence base for future research analyzing the impact of quarantine and isolation policies upon disease outbreak response outcomes. Key Messages1. What is already known on this topic - summarize the state of scientific knowledge on this subject before you did your study and why this study needed to be done Non-pharmaceutical interventions, including quarantine and isolation, are critical to controlling the spread of infectious diseases. Legally-enforceable policies often authorize jurisdictional authorities to implement and enforce non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was widespread and diverse implementation of domestic quarantine and isolation policies. However, there have been no global efforts to collect and analyze the legal frameworks for quarantine and isolation governance and enforcement authorities. 2. What this study adds - summarize what we now know as a result of this study that we did not know before We comprehensively map the current regulatory environment for legally-enforceable quarantine and isolation policies in each UN Member State. We use representative policy examples to demonstrate the diversity in jurisdictional authority to order quarantine and isolation, as well analyze the current penalty schemes employed by nations to enforce non-pharmaceutical interventions. We find that financial enforcement mechanisms that reflect economic fluctuations may remain a more durable deterrent overtime than set penalty ranges, yet few countries utilize such flexible penalization schemes. 3. How this study might affect research, practice or policy - summarize the implications of this study Our novel repository of global quarantine and isolation policies can be used to assist future outbreak responses and identify country-level policy gaps to be addressed through preparedness efforts and updating legal frameworks. Analysis of the impact of different quarantine and isolation policies and enforcement mechanisms upon disease outbreak outcomes using this repository are warranted.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An in-depth statistical analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic’s initial spread in the WHO African region 95%
- An analysis of humanitarian and health aid harmonisation over a decade (2011-2019) of the Syrian conflict 93%
- Use of Interviewer-Administered Telephone Surveys during Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics: A Scoping Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is addressing violence against women prioritised in health policies? Findings from a WHO Policies Database 94%
- Transforming Trade for Vaccine Equity: Policy Gaps and Barriers 94%
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recommended distances for physical distancing during COVID-19 pandemics reveal cultural connections between countries 95%
- Using Google Health Trends to investigate COVID-19 incidence in Africa 94%
- Armed Violent Conflict and Healthcare-Seeking Behavior for Maternal and Child Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relative effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on early Covid-19 mortality: natural experiment in 130 countries 94%
- Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and deaths: cross-national natural experiment in 32 European countries 94%
- Evaluating the Risk of Conflict on Recent Ebola Outbreaks in Guinea and the Democratic Republic of the Congo 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health System Resilience-enhancing Strategies for Managing Public Health Emergencies of International Concerns (PHEIC): Success and Challenges A Systematic Review Protocol 93%
- Epidemiology of COVID-19 and effect of public health interventions, Chennai, India, March - October 2020 93%
- The acceptance of covid-19 vaccines in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from 6 national phone surveys 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.