Back

Interactive effects of genotype with prenatal stress on DNA methylation at birth

Mulder, R. H.; Baltramonaityte, V.; Defina, S.; Trajanoska, K.; Suderman, M.; Schwarz, E.; Boks, M.; Walton, E.; Cecil, C. A. M.; Felix, J.

2024-11-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.11.20.24317575 medRxiv
Show abstract

Intrauterine stress exposure is associated with offspring health. DNA methylation (DNAm) is as a putative underlying mechanism, but large population-based studies reported limited associations between prenatal stress and DNAm. Recent research has shown that environmental factors in interaction with genetic variants are better predictors of DNAm than environment or genotype alone. We investigated whether interactions of maternal prenatal stress with genetic variants are associated with DNAm at birth. We examined 2,963 mother-child pairs from the population-based Generation R Study and Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, using a harmonized, comprehensive cumulative prenatal stress measure. We tested genome-wide genotype-by-prenatal stress interactions on epigenome-wide DNAm (GxEmodel), and models including only genetic variants (Gmodel) or prenatal stress (Emodel) as predictors. Follow-up analyses included Gene Ontology analyses and mediation analyses of prenatal alcohol intake, smoking, gestational age, and birth weight. We report two independent gene-by-prenatal-stress interactions on DNAm after multiple testing correction, including five genetic variants in CHD2 and ORC5, and two DNAm sites in EPPK1. By comparison, the Gmodel showed 691,202 associations and the Emodel showed three associations in genes AHRR, GFI1, and MYO1G, which could largely explained by prenatal smoking. Genes linked to suggestive GxEmodel results were often involved in neuronal development. Our results provide some support of interaction of prenatal stress with the childs genome on DNAm of genes related to neuronal development. These results do not confirm the notion that gene-by-environment interaction models show more associations with DNAm compared to genes or the environment studied in isolation.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
54.8%
50% of probability mass above
2
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
4
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.9%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
7
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
12
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
13
Epigenomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
14
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
15
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
16
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
17
Behavior Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
18
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
25
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
26
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%