Back

An antibiotic-free antimicrobial combination of bacteriocins and a peptidoglycan hydrolase: in vitro and in vivo assessment of its efficacy

Kranjec, C.; Oftedal, T. F.; Ovchinnikov, K. V.; da Silva Duarte, V.; Hermansen, S.; Kaus-Drobek, M.; Sabala, I.; Porcellato, D.; Carlsen, H.; Kjos, M.

2024-11-19 microbiology
10.1101/2024.11.19.624290 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mastitis is an inflammatory disease of the mammary gland commonly brought about by bac-terial pathogens that gain physical access to the glandular epithelium through the teat canal. In bovines, common mastitis-causing agents are environmental or pathogenic bacterial spe-cies, including staphylococci, streptococci, enterococci, and Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli. Current therapeutic strategies for bovine mastitis typically involve the ad-ministration of antibiotic formulations within the infected udder, possibly resulting in in-creased selection of antibiotic resistance and the accumulation of antibiotic residues within the milk. In this study, we sought to design an antibiotic-free antimicrobial formulation to treat bovine mastitis based on bacterial antimicrobial peptides (bacteriocins) and proteins (pepti-doglycan hydrolases). Using a combination of in vitro assays with a range of bacteriocins, we show that the combination of the thiopeptide micrococcin P1 (MP1) and the lantibiotic nisin A (NisA) is a robust antimicrobial formulation that effectively inhibits the growth of bo-vine mastitis-derived bacteria, both in planktonic and biofilm-associated growth modes. The addition of AuresinePlus (Aur, a staphylococcus-specific PGH) further increased the antimi-crobial potency against S. aureus. Furthermore, using two mouse models, a skin infection model and a mastitis model, we show that the combination MP1-NisA-Aur effectively inhibits methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in vivo. We discuss the potential and challenges of using antibiotic-free antimicrobial combinations in the treatment of bacterial infections.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.