Back

Detection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy on electrocardiogram using artificial intelligence

Hillis, J. M.; Bizzo, B. C.; Mercaldo, S. F.; Ghatak, A.; MacDonald, A. L.; Halle, M. A.; Schultz, A. S.; L'Italien, E.; Tam, V.; Bart, N. K.; Moura, F. A.; Awad, A. M.; Bargiela, D.; Dagen, S.; Toland, D.; Blood, A. J.; Gross, D. A.; Jering, K. S.; Lopes, M. S.; Marston, N. A.; Nauffal, V. D.; Dreyer, K. J.; Scirica, B. M.; Ho, C. Y.

2024-11-20 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.11.19.24317545 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality including sudden cardiac death in the young. Its prevalence is estimated to be 1 in 500, although many people are undiagnosed. The ability to screen electrocardiograms (ECGs) for its presence could improve detection and enable earlier diagnosis. ObjectivesThis study evaluated the accuracy of an artificial intelligence device (Viz HCM) in detecting HCM based on 12-lead ECG. MethodsThe device was previously trained using deep learning and provides a binary outcome (HCM suspected or not suspected). This study included 293 HCM-Positive and 2912 HCM-Negative cases, which were selected from three hospitals based on chart review incorporating billing diagnostic codes, cardiac imaging, and ECG features. The device produced an output for 291 (99.3%) HCM-Positive and 2905 (99.8%) HCM-Negative cases. ResultsThe device identified HCM with sensitivity 68.4% (95% CI: 62.8-73.5%), specificity 99.1% (95% CI: 98.7-99.4%) and area under the curve 0.975 (95% CI: 0.965-0.982). With assumed population prevalence of 0.002 (1 in 500), the positive predictive value was 13.7% (95% CI: 10.1-19.9%) and the negative predictive value was 99.9% (95% CI: 99.9-99.9%). The device demonstrated consistent performance across demographic and technical subgroups. ConclusionsThe device identified HCM based on 12-lead ECG with good performance. Coupled with clinical expertise, it has the potential to augment HCM detection and diagnosis.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.