Back

Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation for Treating Bipolar Disorder with Depressive Episodes

Zhou, H.; Wang, M.; Qi, S.; Chen, Q.; Lai, J.; Wu, Z.; Liu, R.; Wang, L.; Tang, J.; Zhang, S.; Hu, S.

2024-11-20 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.11.19.24317540 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBipolar disorder (BD) presents significant challenges in clinical management, often characterized by persistent depressive symptoms and cognitive deficits. Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) has shown promise in targeting deep brain structures with minimal invasiveness. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tTIS in newly diagnosed or medication-washout BD patients. MethodsWe conducted a single-arm clinical trial with 36 BD patients who underwent 10 sessions of tTIS targeting the left nucleus accumbens over one week, with two sessions per day. Each tTIS session lasted 20 minutes, utilizing a maximum current intensity of 2 mA and an envelope stimulation frequency of 40 Hz. Depressive symptoms were assessed pre- and post-intervention using validated scales, including HAMD, QIDS, MADRS, and HAMA, while cognitive functions were evaluated using standardized neuropsychological tests. Safety was monitored through adverse event reporting. ResultsAmong 36 participants, 25 completed the full intervention protocol. Significant reductions were observed in depressive symptom scores: HAMD decreased from 23.36 to 16.16 (P < 0.0001), QIDS from 13.52 to 9.68 (P < 0.001), MADRS from 39.12 to 31.28 (P < 0.01), and HAMA from 19.68 to 15.44 (P < 0.05). Cognitive evaluations demonstrated notable improvements in memory and executive function. Adverse events were mild, primarily limited to transient scalp discomfort. ConclusionsThis study provides preliminary evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of tTIS in alleviating depressive symptoms and improving cognitive function in BD patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.