Back

Towards Multimodal Longitudinal Analysis for Predicting Cognitive Decline

Ashish, R. M.; Turner, J. A.

2025-02-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.11.18.624226 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding and predicting cognitive decline in Alzheimers disease (AD) is crucial for timely intervention and management. While neuroimaging biomarkers and clinical assessments are valuable individually, their combined predictive power and interaction with demographic and cognitive variables remain underexplored. This study lays the groundwork for comprehensive longitudinal analyses by integrating neuroimaging markers and clinical data to predict cognitive changes over time. Using data from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), we applied feature-driven supervised machine learning techniques for assessing cognitive decline predictability. We hypothesize that combining neuroimaging biomarkers with demographic and clinical assessment variables significantly improves the prediction of cognitive decline in Alzheimers disease. Our results show that while imaging biomarkers alone offer moderate predictive capabilities, including key clinical assessment and demographic variables in conjunction with imaging biomarkers significantly improves the model performance. Furthermore, our results indicate that non-imaging variables alone can serve as effective and cost-efficient predictors of cognitive decline. This study underscores the need for integrating multi-dimensional data in future longitudinal research to capture time-dependent patterns in cognitive decline and guide the development of targeted intervention strategies. We also introduce NeuroLAMA - an open and extensible data engineering and machine-learning system, to support the continued investigation by the community

Published in Journal of Emerging Investigators · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.