Optimizing Neoadjuvant Treatment Response Prediction for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using Clinical Trial Data and Deep Auxiliary Learning
Moon, C. I.; Zhang, B.
Show abstract
MotivationTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Developing predictive models for TNBC treatment responses is crucial but challenging due to data scarcity and the reliance on cell line data, which limits clinical translational value. Leveraging omics data from clinical trials, particularly through auxiliary learning, offers a potential solution to enhance predictive accuracy and reduce data requirements. ResultsIn this study, we propose a new approach utilizing deep auxiliary task reweighting learning methods to automatically reweight auxiliary tasks, thereby optimizing the performance of the primary task of predicting TNBC treatment responses. We benchmark various auxiliary learning methods, including ARML, AdaLoss, GradNorm, and OL AUX, against traditional supervised machine learning algorithms and single-task learning baselines. Our results characterize the performance of auxiliary learning across various contexts, including utilizing parallel treatment arms within a multi-arm clinical trial, leveraging treatment arms from different clinical trials, and integrating multiple arms with the same treatment regimens across separate clinical trials. The last scenario also provides an opportunity for validating prediction models on an independent dataset, demonstrating the superior performance of the auxiliary learning models in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) in TNBC patients treated with standardized combinational chemotherapy with Taxane, Anthracycline, and Cyclophosphamide (TAC). Availability and ImplementationSource code and additional resources can be accessed at https://github.com/moonchangin/DeepAux TxPred TNBC.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Data Imbalance in Drug Response Prediction - Multi-Objective Optimization Approach in Deep Learning Setting 95%
- A Survey and Systematic Assessment of Computational Methods for Drug Response Prediction 94%
- Assessing Random Forest self-reproducibility for optimal short biomarker signature discovery 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Highly Accurate Cancer Phenotype Prediction with AKLIMATE, a Stacked Kernel Learner Integrating Multimodal Genomic Data and Pathway Knowledge 95%
- Methodological Challenges in Translational Drug Response Modeling in Cancer 94%
- Tissue-guided LASSO for prediction of clinical drug response using preclinical samples 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven Discovery of Mathematical and Physical Relations in Oncology Data using Human-understandable Machine Learning 94%
- An Explainable Multi-Modal Neural Network Architecture for Predicting Epilepsy Comorbidities Based on Administrative Claims Data 92%
- Survival Prediction Landscape: An In-Depth Systematic Literature Review on Activities, Methods, Tools, Diseases, and Databases 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- CFO: Calibration-Free Odds Bayesian Designs for Dose Finding in Clinical Trials 92%
- A Bayesian Framework for Detecting Gene Expression Outliers in Individual Samples 92%
- Actionability of Synthetic Data in a Heterogeneous and Rare Healthcare Demographic; Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) with Cancer 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.