Targeted DNA ADP-ribosylation triggers templated repair in bacteria and base mutagenesis in eukaryotes
Patinios, C.; Gupta, D.; Bassett, H. V.; Collins, S. P.; Kamm, C.; Kibe, A.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Vollen, K.; Toussaint, C.; Polkoff, K. M.; Nguyen, T.; Calvin, I.; Migur, A.; Al'Abri, I.; Achmedov, T.; del Re, A.; Saliba, A.-E.; Crook, N.; Stepanova, A. N.; Alonso, J. M.; Beisel, C. L.
Show abstract
Base editors create precise genomic edits by directing nucleobase deamination or removal without inducing double-stranded DNA breaks. However, a vast chemical space of other DNA modifications remains to be explored for genome editing. Here, we harness the bacterial anti-phage toxin DarT2 to append ADP-ribosyl moieties to DNA, unlocking distinct editing outcomes in bacteria versus eukaryotes. Fusing an attenuated DarT2 to a Cas9 nickase, we program site-specific ADP-ribosylation of thymines within a target DNA sequence. In tested bacteria, targeting drives efficient homologous recombination in tested bacteria, offering flexible and scar-free genome editing without base replacement nor counterselection. In tested eukaryotes including yeast, plants and human cells, targeting drives substitution of the modified thymine to adenine or a mixture of adenine and cytosine with limited insertions or deletions, offering edits inaccessible to current base editors. Altogether, our approach, called append editing, leverages the addition of a chemical moiety to DNA to expand current modalities for precision gene editing.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cooperativity between Cas9 and hyperactive AID establishes broad and diversifying mutational footprints in base editors 98%
- Simultaneous measurement of biochemical phenotypes and gene expression in single cells 97%
- UPF1 mutants with intact ATPase but deficient helicase activities promote efficient nonsense-mediated mRNA decay 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.