Back

Schistosome esophageal gland factor MEG-8.2 drives host cell lysis and interacts with host immune proteins

Yadav, P.; Simbassa, S. B.; Sloan, R.; Newmark, P. A.; Lee, J.

2024-11-15 microbiology
10.1101/2024.11.15.623777 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Schistosomes are blood flukes that ingest large amounts of host blood during their intra-mammalian stage. The ingested blood contains leukocytes that can be harmful, yet the parasites survive inside the host for decades, reflecting superb immune evasion mechanisms that remain poorly understood. Our previous work discovered that FoxA, a forkhead transcription factor, drives the production of the esophageal gland, an anterior digestive organ essential for degrading the ingested leukocytes and for in vivo survival. However, a comprehensive molecular makeup of the esophageal gland remains unclear. Importantly, which of the esophageal gland factors are responsible for degrading the ingested leukocytes, their mechanism of action, and how such a function relates to parasite survival and immune evasion remains unknown. Here, we identify additional esophageal gland genes by taking a comparative transcriptomics approach to identify transcripts altered in foxA knockdown adult schistosomes. A targeted RNAi screen coupled with biochemistry reveals that specific domains of the micro-exon gene MEG-8.2, can drive host cell lysis in a concentration-dependent manner. Using pull-down assays coupled with mass spectrometry, we discover that MEG-8.2 interacts with several host membrane and extracellular proteins that play important roles in activating innate and/or adaptive immunity. Together, our findings suggest a dual role for MEG-8.2 in effectively lysing the ingested cells in the esophageal lumen and interacting with specific host proteins to neutralize or suppress the host immunity. These findings lay an important foundation for exploiting esophageal gland factors to treat schistosomiasis.

Published in PLOS Pathogens (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.