Back

A novel rhodopsin-based voltage indicator for simultaneous two-photon optical recording with GCaMP in vivo

Villette, V.; Yang, S.; Valenti, R.; Macklin, J. J.; Bradley, J.; Mathieu, B.; Lombardini, A.; Podgorski, K.; Dieudonne, S.; Schreiter, E. R.; Abdelfattah, A. S.

2024-11-17 neuroscience Community evaluation
10.1101/2024.11.15.623698 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) allow optical recording of membrane potential from targeted cells in vivo. However, red GEVIs that are compatible with two-photon microscopy and that can be multiplexed in vivo with green reporters like GCaMP, are currently lacking. To address this gap, we explored diverse rhodopsin proteins as GEVIs and engineered a novel GEVI, 2Photron, based on a rhodopsin from the green algae Klebsormidium nitens. 2Photron, combined with two photon ultrafast local volume excitation (ULoVE), enabled multiplexed readout of spiking and subthreshold voltage simultaneously with GCaMP calcium signals in visual cortical neurons of awake, behaving mice. These recordings revealed the cell-specific relationship of spiking and subthreshold voltage dynamics with GCaMP responses, highlighting the challenges of extracting underlying spike trains from calcium imaging.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
17.8%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
3
Neuron
○ 337 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.3%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.2%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Nature Neuroscience
○ 252 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
8
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.9%
9
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
10
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 13%
3.1%
11
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.3%
12
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
14
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
16
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.0%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.