Immunogenicity and safety of DS-5670d, an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine targeting omicron XBB.1.5: Results from a phase 3, randomized, active-controlled study in adults and children aged >=12 years
Takeshita, F.; Kawamoto, A.; Hashida, M.; Ishida, K.; Furihata, K.; Ota, A.; Takahashi, K.; Sakakibara, S.; Nakano, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundMany people worldwide have now acquired immune responses against the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) following previous vaccination and/or infection. As a result, national vaccination programs are now implementing a simplified schedule of single-dose administration and seasonal boosters. In this phase 3 non-inferiority study, we assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a single dose of the lipid nanoparticle-messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine DS-5670d, a monovalent composition for the 2023/24 season, containing an omicron XBB.1.5-derived antigen. Methods and FindingsAdults and children aged [≥]12 years were stratified according to their history of both prior SARS-CoV-2 infection plus prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination (subpopulation A), prior infection only (subpopulation B), prior vaccination only (subpopulation C), or no history of either infection or vaccination (subpopulation D), and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive DS-5670d or monovalent BNT162b2 omicron XBB.1.5. In the combined ABC subpopulations (DS-5670d, n = 362 vs BNT162b2, n = 363), the adjusted geometric mean titer ratio of blood neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 (omicron XBB.1.5) was 1.218 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.059, 1.401) and the seroresponse rates were 87.3% (DS-5670d) and 82.9% (BNT162b2) with an adjusted difference of 4.5% (95% CI, -0.70, 9.71). Both results exceeded prespecified non-inferiority margins and the study met the primary endpoint. Immunogenicity data in the overall ABCD population also met non-inferiority criteria. There were no apparent differences in immunogenicity according to age or sex, and analyses suggested that even unvaccinated persons achieved an adequate immune response following a single dose of DS-5670d. There were no major differences in the incidence or severity of adverse events between the study vaccination groups. ConclusionsA single dose of DS-5670d was immunogenically non-inferior to BNT162b2 and acceptably safe in persons with or without a history of prior infection and/or vaccination. Trial RegistrationJapan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2031230424) Author summaryWhy was this study done? O_LIThe global emergency response against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is now being superseded by annual immunization using an updated vaccine composition to reduce the disease burden associated with newly emerging variants. C_LIO_LIWe conducted a comparative study of two newly authorized updated vaccine compositions containing the antigen derived from omicron XBB.1.5, which was recommended for the 2023/24 season. C_LIO_LIWe intended to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a single dose of DS-5670d compared with BNT162b2 in Japanese adults and children aged [≥]12 years. C_LI What did the researchers do and find? O_LIIn persons who had received prior vaccination, or who had previously had COVID-19, or both, DS-5670d was non-inferior to BNT162b2 in terms of blood neutralizing activity and seroresponse rates, and immune responses were not influenced by age or sex. C_LIO_LIAmong unvaccinated persons, those who had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 by prior infection achieved an adequate immune response following a single dose of DS-5670d; however, the group who had had no previous exposure at all was too small to properly evaluate. C_LIO_LIThere were no major differences in the frequency or severity of adverse events between the study vaccination groups, and there were no DS-5670d-related serious adverse events. C_LI What do these findings mean? O_LIDS-5670d was immunogenically non-inferior to BNT162b2, which has already been widely administered in Japan. C_LIO_LIThere were no new critical safety concerns associated with DS-5670d, suggesting that it could be a useful SARS-CoV-2 vaccine option. C_LIO_LITaken together, the results from this study of DS-5670d and those from previous studies evaluating other compositions of DS-5670, i.e., those containing antigens from different strains of SARS-CoV-2, provide corroborating evidence that the DS-5670 vaccine platform can be applied to produce effective and safe seasonal vaccines against future emerging strains. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and Safety of Booster Dose of S-268019-b or Tozinameran in Japanese Participants: An Interim Report of Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study 98%
- Safety of the NVX-CoV2373 COVID-19 Vaccine in Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials 96%
- Comparison of the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a reduced and standard booster dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults after two doses of inactivated vaccine 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of a third dose, and immune persistence of CoronaVac vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: interim results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial 97%
- Immunogenicity and Safety Following a Homologous Booster Dose of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine (NVX-CoV2373): A Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 97%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multi-centre study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster with an RBD virus-like particle vaccine following two- or three-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccine 97%
- Interim Analysis of a Phase I Randomized Clinical Trial on the Safety and Immunogenicity of the mRNA-1283 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults 97%
- Safety and immunogenicity of SCB-2019, an adjuvanted, recombinant SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S-protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine in healthy 12–17 year-old adolescents 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 97%
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529): A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression 96%
- Safety and immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine in adolescents aged 12-17 years in Thai population, prospective cohort study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 COVID-19 vaccine in adults: data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase 3 trial in Russia 97%
- Immune response induced by the Recombinant Novel Coronavirus Vaccine (Adenovirus Type 5 Vector) (Ad5-nCoV) in persons living with HIV (PLWH) 95%
- Durability of mRNA-1273 against COVID-19 in the time of Delta: Interim results from an observational cohort study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.