Disparities in cancer genomics by ancestry in the 100,000 Genomes Project
Nguyen, T.; Tallman, S.; Cho, Y.; Sosinsky, A.; Ambrose, J.; Thorn, S.; Mackintosh, M.; Brown, M. A.; Moutsianas, L.; Silver, M. J.; Kuchenbaecker, K.
Show abstract
PurposeMost research on genetic screening and precision oncology is based on participants of European ancestry, making it vital to evaluate the performance of these approaches in diverse populations. We analysed data from the 100,000 Genomes Project (100kGP) to assess ancestry-related differences in cancer variant prioritisation. Patients and MethodsTo assess the representativeness of the 14,775 participants with cancer from the 100kGP, we compared recruitment ratios for self-reported ethnicities to those in England. For genetic ancestry groups we analysed differences in detection rates for potential pathogenic variants (PVs) in the germline and somatic mutations in genes with treatment implications and investigated possible causes of observed disparities. ResultsRecruitment rates for Black and Asian ethnicities compared with White ethnicity in the 100kGP were consistent with rates in England, except for bladder and prostate (Black and Asian) and breast (Asian only) where Black and Asian ethnicities were recruited at higher rates than expected compared to White ethnicity. Patients with non-European genetic ancestry were more likely to carry variants classified as potential pathogenic compared to European ancestry (p=0.006). PVs were identified in 4.6% of South Asian (adjusted model: odds ratio=1.88, 95%CI=1.21-2.93) and 5.3% of African ancestry patients (odds ratio=2.24, 95%CI=1.44-3.48) compared with 2.2% in European. Fewer non-synonymous somatic mutations in actionable genes were identified in patients of non-European ancestry (p=0.004). WGS failed to identify treatment-relevant findings for 26% of patients of South Asian ancestry compared with 16% of European ancestry. ConclusionThe excess germline variants classified as PVs in patients with non-European ancestry may impede the diagnostic process. Our analysis demonstrates the need for better variant classification across diverse ancestries to ensure equitable implementation of genomics in cancer care.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for eight common cancers revealed from a phenome-wide Mendelian randomisation analysis of 378,142 cases and 485,715 controls 95%
- Pan-cancer analysis demonstrates that integrating polygenic risk scores with modifiable risk factors improves risk prediction 95%
- Whole-genome analysis of Nigerian patients with breast cancer reveals ethnic-driven somatic evolution and distinct genomic subtypes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The contribution of coding variants to the heritability of multiple cancer types using UK Biobank whole-exome sequencing data 96%
- Identification of actionable genetic variants in 4,198 Scottish volunteers from the Viking Genes research cohort and implementation of return of results 94%
- Segregation analysis of 17,425 population-based breast cancer families: evidence for genetic susceptibility and risk prediction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hereditary haemochromatosis beyond liver cancer: increased risk of prostate cancer during an 11-year follow-up 95%
- Genetic analysis of functional rare germline variants across 9 cancer types from the DiscovEHR study 92%
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mixed ancestry analysis of whole-genome sequencing reveals common, rare, and structural variants associated with posterior urethral valves 94%
- Assessing the causal role of epigenetic clocks in the development of multiple cancers: a Mendelian randomization study 93%
- Recurrent disruption of tumour suppressor genes in cancer by somatic mutations in cleavage and polyadenylation signals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Isoform-level analyses of 6 cancers uncover extensive genetic risk mechanisms undetected at the gene-level 93%
- Observational and genetic associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and cancer: a UK Biobank and international consortia study 92%
- MmCMS: Mouse models' Consensus Molecular Subtypes of colorectal cancer 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.