Back

Predictability of next elements in chimpanzee gesture sequences

Mielke, A.; Badihi, G.; Donnellan, E.; Graham, K. E.; Hashimoto, C.; Mine, J. G.; Piel, A. K.; Safryghin, A.; Slocombe, K. E.; Soldati, A.; Stewart, F. A.; Townsend, S. W.; Wilke, C.; Zuberbuhler, K.; Zulberti, C.; Hobaiter, C.

2024-11-14 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2024.11.13.623362 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent research has produced evidence for basic combinatorial abilities in the vocal systems of different animal species. Here, we investigate the structure of gesture sequences in Eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) to detect whether gestural communication shows non-random combinations and how combinatorial rules influence predictability. Gesture, as compared to vocalization, offers greater flexibility in how signals are combined--for example overlapping in time -- and as the parsing of signals into sequences is dependent on researcher decisions, we employ a multiverse approach, considering four different definitions of what constitutes a sequence based on varying time thresholds. Our results indicate that sequences tend to be short (even with the most liberal time-window) and that transitions between some gesture types occur more frequently than expected by chance, with some transitions showing significant association across all time-windows. These transitions often involve repetition, suggesting persistence as a key aspect of chimpanzee gestural sequences. Information about previous gestures reduced uncertainty in predicting subsequent gestures. The order of gestures within sequences appears to be less critical than their cooccurrence, challenging assumptions based on the linear patterning derived from vocal communication. Our findings highlight the importance of methodological choices in sequence definition and suggest that chimpanzee gestural communication is characterised by a mix of predictability and flexibility, with implications for understanding the evolution of complex communication systems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.0%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
4
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.3%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
13
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
14
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
16
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
18
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
26
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%