A Genomic Language Model for Zero-Shot Prediction of PromoterVariant Effects
Shearer, C.; Orenbuch, R.; Teufel, F.; Ritter, D.; Steinmetz, C. J.; Xie, E.; Gazizov, A.; Spinner, A.; Frazer, J.; Dias, M.; Notin, P.; Marks, D.
Show abstract
Disease-associated genetic variants occur extensively in noncoding regions like promoters, but current methods focus primarily on single nucleotide variants (SNVs) that typically have small regulatory effect sizes. Expanding beyond single nucleotide events is essential with insertions and deletions (indels) representing the logical next step as they are readily identifiable in population data and more likely to disrupt regulatory elements. However, existing methods struggle with indel prediction, and clinical interpretation often requires assessing complete promoter haplotypes rather than individual variants. We present LOL-EVE (Language Of Life for Evolutionary Variant Effects), a conditional autoregressive transformer trained on 13.6 million mammalian promoter sequences that enables both zero-shot indel prediction and complete promoter sequence scoring. We introduce three benchmarks for promoter indel prediction: ultra rare variant prioritization, causal eQTL identification, and transcription factor binding site disruption analysis. LOL-EVEs superior performance demonstrates that evolutionary patterns learned from indels enable accurate assessment of broader promoter function. Application to Genomics England clinical data shows that LOL-EVE can prioritize promoter haplotypes in known developmental disorder genes, suggesting potential utility for clinical variant assessment. LOL-EVE bridges individual variant prediction with haplotype-level analysis, demonstrating how evolution-based genomic language models may assist in evaluating regulatory variants in complex genetic cases.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Mendelian Randomization: Investigating the causal knowledge of genomic deep learning models 96%
- Deep convolutional and conditional neural networks for large-scale genomic data generation 95%
- Discovering molecular features of intrinsically disordered regions by using evolution for contrastive learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.