Comprehensive baseline ctDNA characterization in two biomarker-selected Phase 1/2 studies using genomic and methylation profiling
Silverman, I. M.; Schonhoft, J. D.; Herzberg, B.; Yablonovitch, A.; Lagow, E.; Sethuraman, S.; Ulanet, D.; Yang, J.; Kim, I.; Basciano, P.; Cecchini, M.; Lee, E.; Lheureux, S.; Fontana, E.; Carneiro, B. A.; Reis-Filho, J. S.; Yap, T. A.; Zinda, M.; Rosen, E. Y.; Rimkunas, V.
Show abstract
The development of DNA damage response (DDR)-directed therapies is a major area of clinical investigation, yet to date Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors remain the only approved therapy in this space. Major challenges to DDR-targeted therapies in the post-PARPi era are the context dependency of DDR alterations and the presence of pre-existing resistance in this heavily pre-treated population. To that end, we used a contemporary platform to analyze pre-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples from 173 patients enrolled onto two Phase 1/2 trials harboring pathogenic variants (PVs) in DDR genes. Baseline ctDNA analysis revealed a wealth of insights, including circulating tumor fraction estimation, impact of clonal hematopoiesis, PV allelic status, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) signatures and presence of pre-existing resistance. HRD reversions were detected in 44% of evaluable patients and included large genomic rearrangements leading to deletion of whole or partial exons. We also discovered reversion of ATM in two patients previously treated with platinum chemotherapy, which has not previously been described. This study showcases the genomic complexity of DDR-altered tumors, revealed through baseline ctDNA profiling, an understanding of which is crucial for the future clinical development of novel DDR-directed therapies and combinations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell-free urine- and plasma DNA mutational analysis predicts neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer 96%
- Circulating tumor DNA analysis in advanced urothelial carcinoma: insights from biological analysis and extended clinical follow-up 95%
- Elucidating the heterogeneity of immunotherapy response and immune-related toxicities by longitudinal ctDNA and immune cell compartment tracking in lung cancer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided Laser Capture Microdissection RNA Sequencing Improves Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping, Prognostic Classification, and Predicts Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates 97%
- Whole genome sequencing improves tissue of origin diagnosis and treatment options for cancer of unknown primary 96%
- The DiffInvex evolutionary model for conditional somatic selection identifies chemotherapy resistance genes in 10,000 cancer genomes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical interpretation of integrative molecular profiles to guide precision cancer medicine 95%
- Comprehensive analysis of mutational signatures in pediatric cancers 95%
- Combined KRASG12C and SOS1 inhibition enhances and extends the anti-tumor response in KRASG12C-driven cancers by addressing intrinsic and acquired resistance 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Germline rare deleterious variant load alters cancer risk, age of onset and tumor characteristics 95%
- Tumor break load quantitates structural variant-associated genomic instability with biological and clinical relevance across cancers 94%
- Predicting the Tumor Microenvironment Composition and Immunotherapy Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer from Digital Histopathology Images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Model for Tumor Type Prediction using Targeted Clinical Genomic Sequencing Data 96%
- The genomic landscape of intrinsic and acquired resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer 96%
- Precision combination therapies based on recurrent oncogenic co-alterations 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.