Machine learning of honey bee olfactory behavior identifies repellent odorants in free flying bees in the field
Kowalewski, J.; Baer-Imhoof, B.; Guda, T.; Luy, M.; DePalma, P.; Baer, B.; Ray, A.
Show abstract
Preventing beneficial insects like honey bees (Apis mellifera) from contacting pesticides on crops using odorants could counter current pollinator declines. However, the discovery of behaviorally aversive odorants is impeded by the complexity of the honey bee olfactory system where >180 olfactory receptors detect volatiles and generate valence. To solve this systems-level challenge we generated a machine-learning model to predict aversive valence from chemical structure using published olfactory behavior data in honey bees. We refine the predictive model by generating species level behavioral data for honey bees and Drosophila on an initial set of novel predicted repellents. The improved second computational model was then used to screen a chemical space of >50 million compounds and identify >130 repellent candidates. Behavioral validation using honey bees in the laboratory show a high predictive success. Additional testing of the top seven candidates using freely foraging honey bees in a field assay confirmed strong repellency, thus predicting a high probability to repel foraging bees from pesticide-treated crops. Machine learning, with iterative testing and modeling therefore provides a powerful approach for rational discovery of aversive volatiles for control of insects for which limited data is available. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTWith honey bee populations declining partly due to pesticide exposure, we aimed to find smells that could keep bees away from pesticide-treated crops. We overcome challenges studying the complex bee olfactory system by developing an AI model trained on existing bee behavior data to predict chemicals bees would find aversive. The predictive model screened millions of compounds, identifying more than 130 potential repellents. Behavior testing in the lab and in field tests confirmed the effectiveness of the bee repellents. This method could lead to bee-safe pesticide formulations, potentially protecting pollinator populations while maintaining crop protection.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinguishing classes of neuroactive drugs based on computational physicochemical properties and experimental phenotypic profiling in planarians 94%
- Odor-evoked transcriptomics of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes 93%
- Hyperbolic odorant mixtures as a basis for more efficient signaling between flowering plants and bees 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal dynamics of honeybee learning and decision-making are revealed by a novel automated PER system 94%
- Chronic high glyphosate exposure delays individual worker bee (Apis mellifera L.) development under field conditions 92%
- Bacillus thuringiensis bioinsecticides induce developmental defects in non-target Drosophila melanogaster larvae 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.