Back

Mass flowering and flowering asynchrony characterise a seasonal herbaceous community in the Western Ghats

Shrotri, S.; Kaur, S.; Dhargalkar, R.; PV., N.; Gowda, V.

2025-03-20 ecology
10.1101/2024.11.10.622833 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Flowering synchrony within a community may be facilitated by climatic factors and by ecological interactions that promote shared pollination services. In contrast, flowering asynchrony is promoted when there is inter-species competition for pollinators. In this multiyear study, we analyse the flowering phenology of a seasonal, herbaceous community (Kaas plateau) in Western Ghats, India to identify environmental constraints that may influence flowering synchrony. We addressed the questions: (a) Is flowering seasonality correlated with climatic factors? (b) Is there evidence for flowering synchrony within the community? (c) Do plant-pollinator interactions shift with flowering phenology? In Kaas, we recorded flowering phenology of 76 herbaceous species and found that climatic factors influenced their flowering phenology. We also identified the community to be composed of a few mass flowering (MF) species ([~]30%) and several non-mass flowering (nMF) species ([~]70%). Using two novel synchrony indices, temporal overlap (SItemp) and synchrony in abundance (SIabd), we also identified higher asynchronous flowering within the community than expected. Notably, species sharing the same floral colour, showed marked absence of synchrony, thus suggesting that competition and not pollinator-mediated facilitation drives flowering asynchrony within Kaas. Finally, pollination networks were observed to shift with flowering abundances within the community. Our findings reveal that even seasonal landscapes like the laterite plateaus, despite their short flowering season that last only 4-5 months, exhibit an overall asynchronous flowering phenology. And, the synchronous flowering for which the Kaas plateau is famous, was noted to be mostly due to a few mass flowering species that alter across years.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.6%
4
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
6
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
7
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
8
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
11
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
15
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
16
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Insect Conservation and Diversity
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
25
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%