Integrated multiomics analysis unveils how macrophages drive immune suppression in breast tumors and affect clinical outcomes
Azimzade, Y.; Haugen, M. H.; Kristensen, V. N.; Frigessi, A.; Kohn-Luque, A.
Show abstract
Despite thorough characterizations of cellular compositions within the breast tumor microenvironment (TME), their implications for disease progression and patient prognosis are still poorly understood. Unraveling these effects is vital for identifying potential targets to improve treatment outcomes. In this study, we devised an explainable machine learning (XML) pipeline to scrutinize the associations between TME cellular constituents and relapse-free survival (RFS). By applying our pipeline to estimated cell fractions in the METABRIC and TCGA datasets and comparing these results with associations to pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), we created a comprehensive catalog of the TMEs role based on 5000 patient samples. Our findings reveal an unexpected dichotomy in which macrophages correlate positively with pCR but negatively with RFS, particularly within estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and Luminal A and B (LumA/B) cancer subtypes. We show that this pattern is driven by heterogeneity in breast tumors characterized by increasing levels of macrophage infiltration. Through imaging mass cytometry (IMC) analysis, we discovered that macrophages tend to accumulate in the vicinity of HLA-ABChi epithelial cells as their frequency increases in tumor tissues and also express elevated levels of HLA-ABC protein. Combining IMC with single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, we uncovered a significant association between these HLA-ABChi macrophages and regulatory and exhausted T cells (TReg and TEx), suggesting their involvement in immune suppression, likely by creating a chronically activated immunosuppressive TME. Subsequent cell-cell communication analysis predicted interactions between HLA-ABChi macrophages and TEx cells via the ligands SIGLEC9, ALCAM, and CSF1, and with TReg cells through APP, ANGPTL4, and SIGLEC9 signaling. Considering the clinical relevance of macrophages in ER+ (LumA/B) subtypes, our research enhances the characterization of macrophage-driven immune suppression in these tumors and identifies potential targets for immunomodulatory strategies.
Matching journals
The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tumor cell intrinsic and extrinsic features predicts prognosis in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer 96%
- Revealing cancer driver genes through integrative transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses with Moonlight 95%
- Exploring tumor-normal cross-talk with TranNet: role of the environment in tumor progression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Epithelial and Stromal Immune Microenvironment in Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis Reveals Prognostic Factors with Digital Cytometry 94%
- Protein profiling of breast carcinomas reveals expression of immune-suppressive factors and signatures relevant to patient outcome 94%
- Identification of interpretable clusters and associated signatures in breast cancer single cell data: a topic modeling approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting tumor immune microenvironment and checkpoint therapy response of head & neck cancer patients from blood immune single-cell transcriptomics 95%
- Transformer-based deep learning integrates multi-omic data with cancer pathways 93%
- WNT4 regulates cellular metabolism via intracellular activity at the mitochondria in breast and gynecologic cancers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrated immunogenomic analyses of high-grade serous ovarian cancer reveal vulnerability to combination immunotherapy 96%
- Dendritic cell effector mechanisms and tumor immune microenvironment infiltration define TLR8 modulation and PD-1 blockade 91%
- Profiling tumor immune microenvironment of non-small cell lung cancer using multiplex immunofluorescence 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.