Aberrant expression of CD14 in breast tumor cells is associated with poor outcome
Katayama, H.; Dou, R.; Leon-Letelier, R. A.; Irajizad, E.; Sevillano, A.; Park, S.; Hsiao, F. C.; Cai, Y.; Vykoukal, J.; Fahrmann, J. F.; Dennison, J. B.; Barrientos-Toro, E.; Raso, M. G.; Sahin, A.; Hanash, S. M.
Show abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that cancer cells can mimic features of immune cells during oncogenic transformation to drive disease progression. We assessed the occurrence of immunological markers in breast cancer cells to determine their expression pattern. We initially analyzed 18 immune protein markers (CCR4, CCR6, CCR7, CD11, CD123, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD24, CD25, CD27, CD3, CD38, CD4, CD45, CD56, CD8 and CXCR3) expressed on the surface of 28 breast cancer cell lines using mass spectrometry. CD14 protein expression in tumor cells and its association with clinical outcomes was subsequently evaluated by tissue microarray (TMA) analysis of 346 breast tumors. Single-cell RNA sequencing data from breast cancer tumors and bulk transcriptomic data of breast cancer cell lines were interrogated for molecular signatures associated with CD14 tumor cell expression. Among the markers interrogated, CD14 protein was aberrantly expressed on the surface of 13 out of 15 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), one of six hormone receptor positive (HR+), one of five hormone receptors negative (HR-)/Her2+ cell lines. Likewise, RNA expression revealed higher levels of CD14 in TNBC cell lines compared to other subtypes. Tumor tissue microarray analysis revealed elevated levels of CD14 membrane expression predominantly in TNBC and was associated with higher tumor grade and increased incidence of disease recurrence compared to CD14-negative tumors. The CD14-positive subgroup exhibited Nuclear Factor Kappa Beta (NFkB) and TGF-{beta} centric networks at both the protein and Single-cell RNA levels. We have uncovered a novel subset of breast cancers characterized by aberrant surface expression of CD14 associated with aggressive disease. CD14 identifies a subset of breast cancers with poor outcome and is a potential therapeutic target.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Extracellular vesicle molecular signatures characterize metastatic dynamicity in ovarian cancer 94%
- ERK3/MAPK6 promotes triple-negative breast cancer progression through collective migration and EMT plasticity 94%
- Syngeneic model of carcinogen-induced tumor mimics basal/squamous, stromal-rich, and neuroendocrine molecular and immunological features of muscle-invasive bladder cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protein profiling of breast carcinomas reveals expression of immune-suppressive factors and signatures relevant to patient outcome 96%
- Characterization of immunoactive and immunotolerant CD4+ T cells in breast cancer by measuring activity of signaling pathways that determine immune cell function 95%
- PRMT1 regulates EGFR and Wnt signaling pathways and is a promising target for combinatorial treatment of breast cancer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Oncometabolite lactate enhances breast cancer progression by orchestrating histone lactylation-dependent c-Myc expression 93%
- PMAIP1-Mediated Glucose Metabolism and its Impact on the Tumor Microenvironment in Breast Cancer: Integration of Multi-Omics Analysis and Experimental Validation 93%
- Gene expression profiles of inflammatory breast cancer reveal high heterogeneity across the epithelial-hybrid-mesenchymal spectrum 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- SPARC in cancer-associated fibroblasts is an independent poor prognostic factor in non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and exhibits pro-tumor activity 96%
- Prelude to Malignancy: A Gene Expression Signature in Normal Mammary Gland from Breast Cancer Patients Suggests Pre-tumorous Alterations and Is Associated with Adverse Outcomes 95%
- Thrombospondin-4 mediates hyperglycemia- and TGF-beta-induced inflammation in breast cancer 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.