Random subsamples of animal populations can reveal intrinsic differences in sociality with key implications in ecology, conservation and disease transmission
Conteddu, K.; Kaur, P.; Brown, M.; Fennessy, J.; Fennessy, S.; Hart, E.; Amin, B.; David, A.; Griffin, L. L.; Faull, J.; Grignolio, S.; Brivio, F.; Haigh, A.; Kirwan, L.; Salter-Townshend, M.; Ciuti, S.
Show abstract
Animal populations are under mounting stress from the dual threats of climate change and rapid global human population growth, raising significant concerns about declining wildlife and the rising risk of zoonotic diseases. In many species, social interactions can be a highly plastic suite of behaviours that are responsive to these disturbances and are consequential to other processes like disease transmission and population dynamics. Studying social interactions can be challenging in that researchers often rely on wildlife population subsamples due to practical constraints and costs, which can introduce biases in the reliability of social network metrics. We investigated the extent to which subsamples can depict intrinsic characteristics of wildlife populations using data from three distinct species: peri-urban fallow deer, Alpine ibex and Angolan giraffe. We showed that random subsamples of these populations could still reveal differences in their social behaviour, indicating that, as long as researchers have a reliable estimate of population size, subsampling animal populations can be an effective and precise method to infer their sociality and offer valuable empirical data for management, conservation and zoonotic disease ecology. Furthermore, we demonstrate that non-random sampling, influenced for instance by animal personality and related trappability, can introduce significant biases in social network estimates. These findings underscore the importance of accounting for sampling biases in social network analysis and offer a robust framework for using partial networks in ecological studies and conservation management.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Numerical response of predators to large variations of grassland vole abundance, long-term community change and prey switches 93%
- Eat or Be Eaten: Implications of potential exploitative competition between wolves and humans across predator- savvy and -naive deer populations 93%
- Absence of reactive temporal response of baboons to the occurrence of predators 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.