Back

Using a sequential sampling algorithm to apply the niche-neutral model to species occurrence patterns

Kristensen, N. P.; Sin, Y. C. K.; Lim, H. S.; Rheindt, F. E.; Chisholm, R. A.

2025-02-19 ecology
10.1101/2024.11.07.622409 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aim: Species occurrence patterns are typically analysed using data-randomisation approaches, which reveal when observed patterns deviate from random expectation, but give little insight why. When non-randomness is detected, the analysis reaches a dead end. Mechanistic models, such as neutral models, offer an alternative: when their predictions fail to match data, the specific nature of each mismatch can implicate candidate mechanisms, turning null-model rejection into a diagnostic process. However, mechanistic models can be computationally expensive. Here, we use an efficient method to simulate such models and explore possible mechanisms governing the occurrence patterns of birds on islands. Location: Riau archipelago, Indonesia. Taxon: Birds. Methods: We used species richness and island--area data to fit a niche--neutral model, where species obey neutral dynamics within non-overlapping discrete niches. We used a sequential sampling algorithm that can efficiently sample presence--absence matrices under the niche-neutral model, and used mismatches to identify which mechanisms were potentially important to occurrence patterns. In particular, we compared model to observed data using standardised effect sizes on segregation (C-score) and nestedness (NODF) metrics. Results: Birds were more segregated and less nested than expected from both data randomisation and the niche--neutral model. Further, while the niche--neutral model reproduced the mean relationship between island size and species richness, it could not produce sufficient variability to account for richness variation across islands. However, while the niche--neutral model was rejected as a null, it was possible to reproduce the species-occurrence patterns by allowing niche diversity and per-capita immigration rate to vary across islands, which increased segregation and decreased nestedness, respectively. Main conclusion: While the species-area relationship could be explained by a model with constant per-capita immigration rates and number of niches across islands, inter-island heterogeneity was needed to explain species-occurrence patterns. Unlike data randomisation, which would have identified the patterns as non-random but offered no further insight, the mechanistic approach identified habitat diversity and immigration-rate variation as candidate mechanisms, demonstrating the diagnostic value of using niche-neutral models as an exploratory framework. The sequential sampling algorithm allowed us to explore different scenarios efficiently and may be useful for identifying potential mechanisms structuring patterns in other systems.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.