Back

Dipstick-based pathogen detection for wastewater surveillance: Variability analysis using gage repeatability and reproducibility

Ahuja, S.; Kulkarni, A.; Kondabagil, K.; Tallur, S.

2024-11-08 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.11.07.24316947 medRxiv
Show abstract

COVID-19 redefined the outlook on pandemic preparedness, accelerating research toward establishing a global consortium for wastewater surveillance. Due to sample heterogeneity and low pathogen loads, microbial concentration remains a key challenge in developing low-cost, point-of-use wastewater monitoring assays. To address this challenge, we have developed a simplified version of dipstick method for RNA capture and isolation from sub-milliliter sample volumes, which simplifies RNA isolation. Given the manual steps involved in executing the dipstick method, variability is a major concern. In this work, we assessed dipstick variability through a multi-operator gage repeatability & reproducibility (gage R&R) study. We focused on detecting pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) and bacteriophage Phi6 in wastewater samples collected from a sewage pumping station at IIT Bombay. Our study demonstrated that the repeatability and reproducibility for the dipstick method are less than the acceptability limit of 30%, and could detect changes in PMMoV load associated with change in the population density due to summer break in our campus. Phi6 is a widely accepted surrogate for enveloped viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, and was therefore also chosen to demonstrate utility of this method for monitoring spread of infectious diseases. This work underscores the effectiveness of gage R&R in assessing and understanding the sources of variations in such assays, including operator-induced and part-to-part differences, essential for developing robust, manually-operated assays.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.