Back

Guidance for the design and analysis of cell-type specific epigenetic epidemiology studies.

Walker, E. M.; Dempster, E. L.; Franklin, A.; Klokkaris, A.; Chioza, B.; Davies, J. P.; Blake, G. E.; Burrage, J.; Policicchio, S.; Bamford, R. A.; Schalkwyk, L. C.; Mill, J.; Hannon, E.

2024-11-08 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.11.06.621949 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent studies on the role of epigenetics in disease have focused on DNA methylation profiled in bulk tissues limiting the detection of the cell-type affected by disease related changes. Advances in isolating homogeneous populations of cells now make it possible to identify DNA methylation differences associated with disease in specific cell-types. Critically, these datasets will require a bespoke analytical framework that can characterise whether the difference affects multiple or is specific to a particular cell-type. We take advantage of a large set of DNA methylation profiles (n = 751) obtained from five different purified cell populations isolated from human prefrontal cortex samples and evaluate the effects on study design, data preprocessing and statistical analysis for cell-specific studies, particularly for scenarios where multiple cell types are included. We describe novel quality control metrics that confirm successful isolation of purified cell populations, which when included in standard preprocessing pipelines provide confidence in the dataset. Our power calculations show substantial gains in detecting differentially methylated positions for some purified cell populations compared to bulk tissue analyses, countering concerns regarding the feasibility of generating large enough sample sizes for informative epidemiological studies. In a simulation study, we evaluated different regression models finding that this choice impacts on the robustness of the results. These findings informed our proposed two-stage framework for association analyses. Overall, our results provide guidance for cell-specific EWAS, establishing standards for study design and analysis, while showcasing the potential of cell-specific DNA methylation analyses to reveal links between epigenetic dysregulation and disease.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.