In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning
Yu, H.; Lyu, H.; Xu, E. Y.; Windolf, C.; Lee, E. K.; Yang, F.; Shelton, A. M.; Olsen, S.; Minavi, S.; Winter, O.; The International Brain Laboratory, ; Dyer, E. L.; Chandrasekaran, C.; Steinmetz, N. A.; Paninski, L.; Hurwitz, C.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWCurrent electrophysiological approaches can track the activity of many neurons, yet it is usually unknown which cell-types or brain areas are being recorded without further molecular or histological analysis. Developing accurate and scalable algorithms for identifying the cell-type and brain region of recorded neurons is thus crucial for improving our understanding of neural computation. In this work, we develop a multimodal contrastive learning approach for neural data that can be fine-tuned for different downstream tasks, including inference of cell-type and brain location. We utilize this approach to jointly embed the activity autocorrelations and extracellular waveforms of individual neurons. We demonstrate that our embedding approach, Neuronal Embeddings via MultimOdal contrastive learning (NEMO), paired with supervised fine-tuning, achieves state-of-the-art cell-type classification for two opto-tagged datasets and brain region classification for the public International Brain Laboratory Brain-wide Map dataset. Our method represents a promising step towards accurate cell-type and brain region classification from electrophysiological recordings. The project page and code are available at https://ibl-nemo.github.io/.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The Individualized Neural Tuning Model: Precise and generalizable cartography of functional architecture in individual brains 94%
- A hierarchical Bayesian brain parcellation framework for fusion of functional imaging datasets 93%
- NeuroConText: Contrastive Learning for Neuroscience Meta-Analysis with Rich Text Representation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.