Passing the quadrat: inferring biodiversity change over time and across investigators
Elahi, R.; Micheli, F.; Watanabe, J. M.
Show abstract
Long-term ecological monitoring inevitably requires a passing of the quadrat from one investigator to another. Here we present the challenge and opportunity of inferring biodiversity change over time and across investigators using a rocky intertidal case study. The intertidal transect was surveyed initially by Willis Hewatt in 1931-1933, then resurveyed in detail by Rafe Sagarin, Sarah Gilman, and their mentors in 1993. In total, the transect has been resurveyed 17 times over the past three decades, with annual surveys nested within five distinct investigator eras. We addressed two goals with our dataset. First, we asked whether temporal change in several biodiversity metrics (species richness, Hill-Shannon and Hill-Simpson diversity, spatial beta diversity) was sensitive to investigator era. Second, we identified recent ecological winners and losers, relative to the historical baseline, and asked whether such designations can change over time (1993-2023). We show that investigators contributed to variable trends in species richness over time, and we hypothesize that sampling effort contributed to this effect. In contrast, we highlight declines in the biodiversity of common species (Hill-Shannon) and dominant species (Hill-Simpson) over time, in the absence of investigator effects. These declines were associated with the rise of a few numerically dominant species and a trend of increasing spatial similarity. Relative to the historical baseline, ecological winners included certain barnacles, anemones, and turban snails, while losers included mussels, urchins, limpets and a host of more cryptic taxa. However, we show that such designations can be complicated by non-linear population trajectories and discuss mechanisms related to climate change versus potential artifacts related to investigator effort. We finish with recommendations and emphasize the value of marine stations in providing a venue for sustained periodic ecological monitoring at small spatial scales, long duration, and fine taxonomic resolution.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs? 94%
- Sampling from commercial vessel routes can capture marine biodiversity distributions effectively 94%
- Pool choice in a vertical landscape: tadpole rearing site flexibility in phytotelm-breeding frogs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Environmental DNA in a Global Biodiversity Hotspot: Lessons from Coral Reef Fish Diversity Across the Indonesian Archipelago 95%
- Generating and testing ecological hypotheses at the pondscape with environmental DNA metabarcoding: a case study on a threatened amphibian 95%
- Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding differentiates between micro-habitats within the rocky intertidal 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- DNA metabarcoding reveals the threat of rapidly expanding barred owl populations to native wildlife in western North America 94%
- An expert-based global assessment of threats and conservation measures for subterranean ecosystems 93%
- Patterns of community science data use in peer-reviewed research on biodiversity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Phylogenetic diversity efficiently and accurately prioritizes the conservation of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities 93%
- Assessing the overlap between fishing activities and chondrichthyans distribution exposes high-risk areas for bycatch of threatened species 92%
- Researcher effects on the biological structure and edaphic conditions of field sites and implications for management. 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.