Back

Predicting Tumor Mutational Burden from UHF-Dielectrophoresis Crossover Frequency

Daverat, H.; Blasco, N.; Robert, S.; Pothier, A.; Rovini, A.; Boutaud, M.; Jemfer, C.; Dalmay, C.; Lalloue, F.; Durand, K.; Naves, T.

2024-11-06 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.11.05.622085 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) has emerged as a crucial biomarker to guide patient eligibility for immunotherapy. However, whole exome sequencing, the gold-standard method for TMB measurement, remains limited in accessibility due to its high costs, operational complexity, and lengthy processing times. To address these limitations, we investigated whether Ultra-High-Frequency (UHF) technology could serve as a novel approach to assess TMB by analyzing the crossover frequencies or electromagnetic signature (EMS) of cancer cells on a lab-on-a-chip biosensor, integrating microfluidics and dielectrophoresis. In a panel of 12 cancer cell lines with varying TMB levels, we observed that EMS showed an upward shift correlating with higher TMB, particularly in solid tumor cell lines. This finding suggests a potential relationship between TMB and EMS. To further explore this hypothesis, we artificially increased mutation levels by treating cells with the highly mutagenic compound N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU). Results showed that EMS captured significant TMB variations in ENU-treated cells with enhanced proliferative capacity compared to their parental counterparts. These results underscore the importance of matched control samples for reliable EMS measurements. Altogether, our findings highlight the potential of EMS to detect TMB variations associated with proliferative activity, a key hallmark of cancer cells, thereby enabling a more precise stratification of cancer cells. HighlightsO_LIWe propose a new biosensor to improve patient stratification for ICI eligibility C_LIO_LIHigh frequency fields and dielectric spectroscopy can estimate TMB in cancer cells C_LIO_LISignificant changes in UHF-DEP signatures correlate with varying TMB levels C_LIO_LIUHF-DEP provides a cheap, rapid and label-free method to predict ICI response C_LIO_LIOffers an innovative and complementary marker to conventional diagnostic approaches C_LI Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=92 SRC="FIGDIR/small/622085v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (22K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@703983org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cfdf46org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4b9285org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1809255_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.2%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
3
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
4
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
6
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.0%
11
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
13
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
15
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
18
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
23
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
26
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
29
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%