Back

An Optimal Mass Transport Model for the Analysis of DCE-MRI and its Application to Breast Cancer Treatment Response

Chen, X.; Huang, W.; Shukla-Dave, A.; Paudyal, R.; Gullo, R. L.; Perez, M.; Pinker, K.; Deasy, J. O.

2024-11-07 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.11.05.24316768 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeDynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) is widely deployed in cancer care and research, but the methods conventionally used to quantify contrast agent kinetics do not account the cross-voxel movement characterized by advection and diffusion. We hypothesized that unbalanced optimal mass transport could be used to quantify and visualize such contrast agent flows across tumor volumes. MethodsWe developed a computational fluid dynamics model termed the unbalanced regularized optimal mass transport (urOMT) model. We tested the urOMT on a multi-institutional dataset of 153 longitudinal DCE-MRI scans from 39 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT.) ResultsThe urOMT model can quantify dynamic fluid transport properties such as net speed, flux and rates of contrast entering and leaving the tumor (influx and efflux). The urOMT model can also visualize the trajectories and directions of net fluid flows. Quantitative metrics from urOMT exhibited distinct patterns that may be relevant to predicting pathological complete response (pCR) to NACT. ConclusionThe urOMT model can be used to estimate and visualize local fluid flow in DCE-MRI breast cancer images. Model-based estimates of flux, influx and efflux should be tested as potential predictive imaging biomarkers to measure treatment effectiveness in patients treated with NACT. The urOMT model in principle has applicability to other cancer imaging use cases, but this will require further testing.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.