Back

Evolution and functioning of an X-A balance sex determination system in hops

Akagi, T.; Segawa, T.; Uchida, R.; Tanaka, H.; Shirasawa, K.; Yamagishi, N.; Yaegashi, H.; Natsume, S.; Takagi, H.; Abe, A.; Okuno, M.; Toyoda, A.; Sato, K.; Honniden, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ushijima, K.; Patzak, J.; Horakova, L.; Bacovsky, V.; Hobza, R.; Charlesworth, D.; Itoh, T.; Ono, E.

2024-11-06 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.11.04.621975 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chromosomal sex determining systems with male heterogamety include actively male-determining-Y and X-A balance systems, both of which are found in animals and plants. The sex-determining genes have been identified in several active-Y plant systems, but the evolution and functioning of X-A balance systems remains mysterious. To study this, we sequenced and compared the genomes of two hop species. The evolution of the hop X-A balance system involved an ancient recombination suppression event across a large X chromosome region shared by both species. In one species, an autosome fused to this ancestral sex chromosome, and recombination was subsequently suppressed again. The two evolutionary strata created in this neo-X have degenerated to different degrees, and evolved correspondingly different dosage compensation levels that correlate with histone modification patterns. Finally, we identified an X-specific ETR1-like ethylene receptor in the ancestral X region. Its dosage may affect sex determination, as part of the counting mechanism of this X-A balance system. One sentence summaryBased on whole genome sequences of the cultivated hop, Humulus lupulus, and its wild relative H. japonicus, we describe the evolution of sex chromosomal regions, three of which that evolved region-specific dosage compensation, and identify a candidate gene involved in their X-A balance sex determining system.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.