dArc1 controls sugar reward valuation in Drosophila melanogaster
Caron, S. J. C.; Bervoets, S.; Jacob, M. S.; Devineni, A.; Mahoney, B. D.; Sullivan, K. R.; Butts, A. R.; Sung, H.; Einstein, J.; Metzstein, M. M.; Dus, M.; Shepherd, J. D.
Show abstract
The Arc genes -- which include Drosophila Arc1 and Arc2 (dArc) -- evolved from Ty3 retrotransposons and encode proteins that form virus-like capsids. These capsids enable a novel form of intercellular communication by transferring RNAs between cells. However, the specific neuronal circuits and brain processes Arc intercellular signaling regulates remain unknown. Here, we show that loss of both dArc genes in Drosophila melanogaster enhances associative learning in an appetitive conditioning paradigm, where flies associate an odor with sugar rewards. This increased learning performance arises from an increased valuation of sugar rewards: unlike wild-type flies, dArc-/- flies form abnormally strong associations even when the sugar reward is small or has no caloric value. We found that the {gamma}5-dopaminergic neurons of the protocerebral anterior medial (PAM) cluster, which encode the positive valence of sugar rewards, show heightened activity in response to sucrose in dArc-/- flies. We further show that the learning phenotype of dArc-/- flies depends on the formation of capsids, underscoring a direct role for capsid-mediated Arc signaling in sugar valuation. Our findings establish dArc genes as critical regulators of reward valuation in D. melanogaster, acting through a non-cell autonomous mechanism that relies on capsid-mediated communication between cells.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Unsupervised Restoration of a Complex Learned Behavior After Large-Scale Neuronal Perturbation 98%
- Emergence of a somatosensory tonotopic map for substrate vibration in the brainstem 98%
- Individual differences in decision-making shape how mesolimbic dopamine regulates choice confidence and change-of-mind 98%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.