Back

Cilia dysfunction in the lateral ventricles after neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage does not lead to functional changes in cilia-based CSF flow networks

Pan, S.; Ramagiri, S.; Yang, L.; Giles, D. A.; Xu, I.; Garcia Bonilla, M.; DeFreitas, D.; Siderowf, L. W.; Koneru, S.; Halupnik, G. L.; Koller, G. M.; Polavarapu, S.; Gupta, D. K.; Miller, M. J.; Esakky, P.; Limbrick, D. D.; Bayly, P. V.; Horani, A.; Brody, S. L.; Mahjoub, M. R.; Strahle, J.

2024-11-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.11.03.621724 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) has long been thought to lead to motile cilia dysfunction whereby intraventricular blood breakdown products damage and slough cilia from the ependymal wall. However, specifically how IVH may affect cilia development, structure, and transcriptional activation is not well-understood. Moreover, the impact of blood breakdown product-mediated cilia damage on the functional organization of cilia-based CSF flow networks is unknown. Here, we show hemoglobin exposure affects the number of ciliated ependymal cells in the lateral ventricle (LV) but does not impact in vitro beat frequency of the remaining cilia. Ultrastructurally, IVH decreases the total number of ciliary tufts without impacting axoneme structure. IVH does not result in changes in the expression of cilia-related genes and instead leads to downregulation of neurogenesis markers in parallel with innate immune upregulation. Functionally, we identify three previously uncharacterized cilia-mediated CSF flow domains in the LV lateral wall and show that IVH does not result in widespread disruption of their functional organization. These data de-emphasize cilia as a major contributor to global CSF dysfunction after IVH, and instead call attention to preserving the neurodevelopmental environment and preventing runaway innate immune system activation, as considerations to developing treatment strategies to prevent posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus and other neurodevelopmental sequelae.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.