Back

Strip cropping in organic agriculture results in 15% higher ground beetle richness and 30% higher activity density than monocultures

Croijmans, L.; Cuperus, F.; van Apeldoorn, D. F.; Bianchi, F. J. J. A.; Rossing, W. A. H.; Poelman, E.

2025-04-03 ecology
10.1101/2024.11.02.621655 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Global biodiversity is declining at an unprecedented rate, with agriculture as one of the major drivers. There is mounting evidence that intercropping can increase insect biodiversity while maintaining or increasing yield. Yet, intercropping is often considered impractical for mechanized farming systems. Strip cropping is a type of intercropping that is compatible with standard farm machinery and has been pioneered by Dutch farmers since 2014. Here, we present ground beetle data from four organically managed experimental farms across four years. Ground beetles are sensitive to changes in habitats and disturbances, and hold keystone positions in agroecosystem food webs. We show that strip cropping systems can enhance ground beetle biodiversity, while other studies showed that these increases have been achieved without incurring major yield loss. Strip cropped fields had on average 15% more ground beetle species and 30% more individuals than monocultural fields. The higher ground beetle richness in strip crops was explained by the merger of crop-related ground beetle communities, rather than by ground beetle species unique to strip cropping systems. The increase in field-level beetle species richness in organic agriculture through strip cropping approached increases found for other readily deployed biodiversity conservation methods, like shifting from conventional to organic agriculture (+19% - +23%). This indicates that strip cropping is a potentially useful tool supporting ground beetle biodiversity in agricultural fields without compromising food production.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
48.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 5%
19.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
5
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
7
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
9
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
10
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
11
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
12
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
13
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
15
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
16
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
19
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.7%
21
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
25
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%