Back

In vivo single-cell ribosome profiling reveals cell-type-specific translational programs during aging

Dure, C.; Ghoshdastider, U.; Weber, R.; Valdivia-Francia, F.; Renz, P. F.; Khandekar, A.; Sella, F.; Hyams, K.; Taborsky, D.; Yigit, M.; Ormiston, M.; Yamahachi, H.; Levesque, M.; Ellis, S. J.; Sendoel, A.

2024-11-03 genomics
10.1101/2024.11.02.621639 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Somatic stem cells are characterized by their low overall protein synthesis rates, a feature implicated in driving their stemness. However, how aging reshapes the translational landscape of stem cells and how these changes impact their regenerative capacity remains poorly understood. Here, we present an in vivo single-cell ribosome profiling strategy to monitor tissue-wide translational landscapes of the young and aged mouse epidermis. By implementing ribosomal elongation-inhibited cell isolation and switching to RNase I ribonuclease for generating ribosomal footprints, we expand the applicability of single-cell ribosome profiling to in vivo systems and facilitate the evaluation of triplet periodicity, a hallmark of high-quality ribosome profiling data. Leveraging this strategy and integrating ribosome profiling with single-cell RNA sequencing, we document the in vivo translational landscapes of the major epidermal cell types, outline cell-type-specific translational efficiencies and capture heterogeneity in differentiation commitment within stem cell populations. Notably, we identify a pronounced translational reprogramming of AP-1 subunits specifically in aged epidermal stem cells, with functional consequences for keratinocyte behavior. Our study illustrates the power of in vivo single-cell ribosome profiling to map cell-type-specific translational programs and offers a scalable strategy for tissue-wide interrogation of translational landscapes at single-cell resolution.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.