The Society of Radiologists in Training (SRT) 2024 Training Survey on the impact of recent changes to training and non-radiologist roles.
Kilic, Y.; Colman, J.; Kiandee, M.; Shyamanur, B.; Ngu, W. P.; Watura, E.
Show abstract
IntroductionIn 2016, the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) launched an initiative to address the radiology workforce crisis in the UK, focusing on increasing the number of training places. To address this, the RCR advocated for the introduction of skill mix and expanded imaging training academies. The NHSs 2023 long-term workforce plan proposed increased integration of medical associate professions (MAPs) in radiology, although this has raised concerns regarding regulation and training quality. MethodsWe conducted an online survey targeting UK radiologists to gather insights on their perceptions of training quality, recent modifications to training, and views on non-radiologist roles. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the ways in which these elements affect their training experiences and general contentment. ResultsA total of 227 responses were collected, predominantly from residents across all UK training deaneries. 63.9% of trainees expressed satisfaction with their training although this varied, with trainees in new/hybrid academies reporting lower satisfaction. Concerns about training quality were prevalent, attributed to numerous factors such as consultants working from home and increased training numbers. Although opinions on the new curriculum were divided, many commented on the challenges of meeting the new IR competences, and the greater focus on general training was perceived more adversely. Career prospects in radiology were often bleak. ConclusionThe survey results highlighted a multifaceted array of perceptions and concerns amongst radiology residents regarding several factors negatively impacting their training, such as changes to the curriculum and growth of non-radiologist roles.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 92%
- Early user experience and lessons learned using ultra-portable digital X-ray with computer-aided detection (DXR-CAD) products: A qualitative study from the perspective of healthcare providers 92%
- Wading through Molasses: A qualitative examination of the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of Australian medical practitioners regarding medical billing 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 91%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 91%
- COVID-19 Advanced Respiratory Care Educational Training Program for Healthcare Workers in Lesotho: An Observational Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 92%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 90%
- “This is a quiz” Premise Input: A Key to Unlocking Higher Diagnostic Accuracy in Large Language Models 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Team-Based Learning Versus Lecture-Based Instruction for Chest Radiograph Interpretation in Physician Associate Education: A Quasi-Experimental Study 93%
- Student self-assessment: feasibility, advantages and limitations Example of a workshop for trainee surgeons using a suture score 92%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI 93%
- MyoVision-US: an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software for Automated Analysis of Skeletal Muscle Ultrasonography 90%
- Inconsistency of AI in Intracranial Aneurysm Detection with Varying Dose and Image Reconstruction 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.