Back

Neural synchrony is "good enough" for speech comprehension

Rafferty, M. B.; Brown, E. C.; Casenhiser, D. M.

2024-11-01 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.11.01.621536 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent evidence indicates that neural populations exhibit synchronous firing at phrase boundaries to facilitate the encoding of syntactic units during speech comprehension. However, good-enough processing accounts of speech comprehension suggest that detailed syntactic analysis may not always be necessary for successful interpretation, especially when listeners can deduce meaning from lexical-semantic contexts. In this brief report, we evaluate this notion and assess whether neural synchrony to syntactic boundaries is modulated by local lexical-semantic content. To this end, we reanalyzed an open-source EEG dataset, consisting of brain recordings obtained while participants passively listened to an audiobook. To determine neural synchrony to phrase boundaries, we computed mutual information (MI) between delta band EEG activity (< 3Hz) and hierarchically derived syntactic structures for each sentence in the audiobook. We then quantified local-lexical semantic contexts using semantic dissimilarity values that were derived from high-dimensional vectors of co-occurrence. We then regressed MI values for each sentence against the sentences semantic dissimilarity values, using linear mixed-effects models. Results indicated that neural synchrony to phrase boundaries showed a positive linear relationship with semantic dissimilarity. We interpret this finding as evidence that listeners reliance on syntactic information during speech comprehension is modulated by local lexical-semantic contexts, consistent with good-enough processing accounts.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.