Cognitive networks interactions through communication subspaces in large-scale models of the neocortex
Pereira-Obilinovic, U.; Froudist-Walsh, S.; Wang, X.-J.
Show abstract
Neocortex-wide neural activity is organized into distinct networks of areas engaged in different cognitive processes. To elucidate the underlying mechanism of flexible network reconfiguration, we developed connectivity-constrained macaque and human whole-cortex models. In our model, within-area connectivity consists of a mixture of symmetric, asymmetric, and random motifs that give rise to stable (attractor) or transient (sequential) heterogeneous dynamics. Assuming sparse low-rank plus random inter-areal connectivity constrained by cognitive networks activation maps, we show that our model captures key aspects of the cognitive networks dynamics and interactions observed experimentally. In particular, the anti-correlation between the default mode network and the dorsal attention network. Communication between networks is shaped by the alignment of long-range communication subspaces with local connectivity motifs and is switchable in a bottom-up salience-dependent routing mechanism. Furthermore, the frontoparietal multiple-demand network displays a coexistence of stable and dynamic coding, suitable for top-down cognitive control. Our work provides a theoretical framework for understanding the dynamic routing in the cortical networks during cognition.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Metastable attractors explain the variable timing of stable behavioral action sequences 97%
- A unified theory for the computational and mechanistic origins of grid cells 97%
- Modulation of metastable ensemble dynamics explains the inverted-U relationship between tone discriminability and arousal in auditory cortex 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.