Back

Novel symbionts reveal amoebae as significant hosts for environmental chlamydiae

Liu, F.; Walker, L. M.; Wolf, J.; Thompson, C.; Haselkorn, T. S.; Shi, Y.; Ding, J.; Strassmann, J. E.; Queller, D.; Shu, L.

2024-11-01 microbiology
10.1101/2024.11.01.621453 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chlamydiae represent a diverse group of obligate intracellular bacteria with elusive hosts in environmental settings. This study used one of the largest collections of wild amoebae (Dictyostelium discoideum and D. giganteum, 106 clones) collected over the past two decades to screen for novel environmental chlamydiae. We found that novel environmental chlamydiae are prevalent in two wild Dictyostelium species and assembled 42 novel chlamydiae metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). The MAGs represent three chlamydiae species previously only reported using 16S sequencing. Their genomes are divergent enough from other species to warrant placing them in two new genera (tentatively called Ca. Dictychlamydia sp. LF1, Ca. Dictychlamydia sp. LF2, and Ca. Feichlamydia sp. LF3). In addition, these chlamydiae species show strong host specificity with two Dictyostelium amoeba hosts, except one amoeba sample. Ca. Dictychlamydia sp. LF1 and Ca. Feichlamydia sp. LF3 was exclusively observed in D. discoideum, while Ca. Dictychlamydia sp. LF2 was found only in D. giganteum. Phylogenetic and comparative genomic analyses suggest that all three chlamydiae are close to arthropod-associated chlamydiae and likely have some intermediate characteristics between previously reported amoeba-associated and vertebrate-associated chlamydiae. This study significantly broadens our understanding of the chlamydial host range and underscores the role of amoebae as vital hosts for environmental chlamydiae.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.