Back

SNP panel for non-invasive genotyping of leopard (Panthera pardus)

Spong, G.; Bertola, L.; De Vry, A. M.; Dussex, N.; Shiffthaler, B.; Paijmans, J.; Hofreiter, M.; Forbes, R.; Kerley, G.; Everatt, K.; Chifunte, C.; Becker, M.; Creel, S.; Bourgeois, S.; Drouilly, M.; Mamugy, F.

2025-03-27 genetics
10.1101/2024.11.01.621452 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genetic resources for species monitoring should ideally be relevant for the species full distribution range, feasible economically and logistically, and validated for the range of sample types collected from the field. This is particularly important for large carnivores that are elusive and wide-ranging, where individual and population processes often traverse administrative borders, and where obtaining high-quality samples can be challenging. Here we present a small species-specific SNP panel for leopards. We used whole genome data from across the global range and RAD sequence data from Zambian leopards to select markers for assay development. These were ascertained for 590 individual leopards from eight African countries and final selection was based on marker variation and performance on non-invasive samples. The final 96 marker panel holds 5 mitochondrial markers for species recognition, 3 Y-markers for determination of individual sex, 3 X-markers and 85 somatic markers, with an associated genetic baseline holding nearly 900 individuals. The selected autosomal markers hold variation across the global range with high power to identify individuals (PID=2,45x10-35) and in most cases their provenance with high assignment probability (>95%). Markers were also selected based on their performance on samples with low target DNA content, with distinct genotype separation in the output marker plots. The genotypes from this panel are thus straightforward to analyze and do not require computationally challenging bioinformatic resources, making this a low cost and accessible resource for leopard monitoring and research.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
3
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.5%
5
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
6
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
7
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
8
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
11
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
12
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
17
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
20
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
Genetics Selection Evolution
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
22
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%