The Impact of Operative Video Review and Annotation on Training in Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery: A Preclinical Randomised Controlled Study
Burrows, E. J.; Starup-Hansen, J.; Khan, D. Z.; Koh, C. H.; Hussain, M.; Booker, J.; Marcus, H. J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis study evaluated the effect of active operative video annotation on surgical education, specifically focusing on implementability, knowledge acquisition, skill development, and confidence. BackgroundResident duty hour restrictions necessitate more efficient surgical training, as steep learning curves in many procedures may result in residents completing training without gaining enough experience to perform them safely. Video annotation of operative videos, involving labeling of instruments and steps, might offer a secure and risk-free environment to improve surgical learning. MethodsA preclinical randomized controlled trial was conducted with novice neurosurgeons from multiple centres. Participants were assigned to annotate real-life operative videos or to the control group, who performed passive video review. At baseline and then following either video annotation or video review, both groups completed a simulated pituitary adenoma resection on a validated high-fidelity physical simulator and were assessed using knowledge quizzes, a modified Global Rating Scale (mGRS), and confidence surveys. Participants also completed an implementability questionnaire. ResultsFourteen participants completed the study. Psychometric surveys indicated 100% agreement on feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness in the annotation group, significantly higher than the review group (p<0.001). Procedural knowledge score changes were significantly higher in the annotation group compared to the video review group (1.71, 95% CI: 0.19-3.41, p= 0.0479). The annotation group also significantly improved their operative performance from baseline, with mean mGRS increasing by 5.14 (95% CI: 2.36-7.93, p=0.004) versus 2.57 (95% CI: -1.30-6.44) (p=0.16) in the video review group. Confidence improved significantly in both groups (<0.05), with no significant difference between groups. ConclusionsActive video annotation is a feasible and acceptable tool for enhancing surgical education. It led to a higher change in knowledge score compared to passive video review and also improved skills and confidence from baseline, suggesting its suitability for integration into surgical training programs. Its impact, however, on real-world surgical performance and patient outcomes requires further study.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of a Wireless Audio System on Communication in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Controlled Trial 95%
- Virtual reality as a strategy for intra-operatory anxiolysis and pharmacological sparing in patients undergoing breast surgeries: the V-RAPS randomized controlled trial protocol 94%
- Improving the learning curve in monoportal endoscopic lumbar surgery: development and validation of a porcine training model. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiological and Psychological Effects of Parental Traditional Thai Massage on Children with Autism: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 90%
- Pilot Feasibility Clinical Trial of Virtual Reality for Pain Management During Repeated Pediatric Laser Procedures: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial 90%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Student self-assessment: feasibility, advantages and limitations Example of a workshop for trainee surgeons using a suture score 94%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 93%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 92%
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 91%
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the Federated Data Platform's digital surgery scheduling system on elective theatre utilisation at an NHS Trust: an interrupted time series analysis 91%
- The effect of digital-enabled multidisciplinary therapy conferences on efficiency and quality of the decision making in prostate-cancer care 90%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.