Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of IMU-838, in Combination with oseltamivir, in Adults with Coronavirus-19- a feasibility trial
Sharma, K.; Berry, L.; Vryonis, E.; Ali, A.; Lara, B.; Noufaily, A.; Parsons, N.; Bradley, C. J.; Haley, B.; Joshi, S.; Maria, T.; Arasaradnam, R. P.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe global urgency for effective treatments against SARS-CoV-2 infections, causing COVID-19, remains paramount. One promising avenue is repurposing existing medications. IMU-838, a dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibitor, has exhibited potent antiviral effects against respiratory viruses. In rodent studies, its combined administration with oseltamivir has shown therapeutic potential against both influenza and SARS-CoV-2. ObjectiveThe primary aim of the IONIC pilot feasibility trial was to comprehensively explore the feasibility and safety challenges associated with administering the novel treatment regimen of IMU-838 combined with oseltamivir to COVID-19 patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate whether a 14-day treatment course with IMU-838 and oseltamivir improves time to clinical improvement compared to oseltamivir alone, defined as the duration from randomization to achieving a 2-point improvement on the WHO ordinal scale, discharge from the hospital, or occurrence of death, whichever comes first. MethodsIONIC was a Phase IIb, randomised, open-label, single centre trial. Prospective participants were recruited from a single centre within the UK and were eligible if they had moderate to severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalisation, were aged 18 years or above. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to either the IONIC intervention arm (IMU-838 + oseltamivir + standard care) or the control arm (oseltamivir + standard care). Sponsored by the University Hospital Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust and funded by LifeArc, the trial comprises two distinct phases: a pilot feasibility study and a main study. The aim of the feasibility study was to inform the design and execution of the main study. However, due to recruitment challenges, the main study was not conducted. The present paper reports the results of the feasibility study. The trial was prospectively registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN53038326) and Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04516915) FindingsBetween 22 Jun 2020 and 20th May 2022, 38 participants were recruited into the trial. Recruitment challenges hindered the main study, but the feasibility trial provided encouraging findings. Treatment completion rates stood at 84%, with no serious adverse effects observed affirming the safety profile of the novel treatment. Although no statistically significant difference emerged in time to clinical improvement between the treatment and control groups, logistic regression analysis indicated a notable association between the treatment group and clinical improvement within a 14-day window. These results emphasize the crucial role of feasibility studies in guiding larger-scale trials and underscore the necessity for further investigation into the therapeutic potential of this approach to the treatment of COVID-19.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 94%
- Trials that turn from retrospectively registered to prospectively registered: A cohort study of ‘retroactively prospective’ clinical trial registration using history data 93%
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 95%
- Doxycycline for the prevention of progression of COVID-19 to severe disease requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission: a randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group trial (DOXPREVENT.ICU) 95%
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydroxychloroquine for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in health care workers: a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial (HERO-HCQ) 95%
- Favorable outcome on viral load and culture viability using Ivermectin in early treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19, A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. 95%
- A shorter symptom-onset to remdesivir treatment (SORT) interval is associated with a lower mortality in moderate-to-severe COVID-19: A real-world analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- CATALYST trial protocol: A multicentre, open-label, phase II, multi-arm trial for an early and accelerated evaluation of the potential treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults 95%
- Efficacy of Lactococcus lactis strain plasma (LC-Plasma) in easing symptoms in patients with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): protocol for an exploratory, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (PLATEAU study) 94%
- Efficacy of remdesivir versus placebo for the treatment of COVID-19: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety, Virology, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Experience of High-dose Intravenous Sotrovimab for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate COVID-19: An Open-label Clinical Trial 93%
- Cost-effectiveness of remdesivir and dexamethasone for COVID-19 treatment in South Africa 93%
- Safety of Hydroxychloroquine among Outpatient Clinical Trial Participants for COVID-19 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.