Association between polygenic risk and survival in breast cancer patients
Kurant, D.; Groha, S.; Ding, Y.; German, C.; Wang, W.; Granka, J. M.; Holmes, M. V.; 23andMe Research Team, ; Shringarpure, S. S.; Gusev, A. S.
Show abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) estimate an individuals germline genetic predisposition to a quantitative trait and/or risk of disease. Several PRS have been developed for cancer risk with the goal of improved risk screening. However, little is known about the association with subsequent outcomes for individuals who develop cancer. Here, we sought to establish whether PRS for cancer risk and other common traits may influence survival for patients with cancer. We conducted a PRS survival analysis using 23,770 European cancer patients from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Profile cohort. We identified an association between PRS for breast cancer risk and longer patient survival (HR = 0.89, p = 1.50x10-4, <5% FDR), implying that individuals at high genetic risk had better outcomes. High PRS individuals were also significantly less likely to harbor somatic TP53 mutations, consistent with having less aggressive tumors. This association persisted when including tumor grade and became more protective when restricting to ER-negative tumors (HR = 0.78, p = 1.69x10-4). Potential confounders such as hormone receptor status, age, grade, stage, and ER-targeted therapy did not fully explain this association, nor was there statistical evidence of index event bias at individual variants. We did not observe significant associations between cancer risk and survival for other cancers, suggesting that this mechanism may be largely unique to breast cancer. However, we did observe associations between shorter survival and type 2 diabetes, bipolar, and pancreatitis PRS (1% FDR). These findings suggest that higher germline risk may predispose individuals to less aggressive breast cancer tumors and provide novel insights into breast cancer development and prognosis.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clustering of HR+/HER2- breast cancer in an Asian cohort is driven by immune phenotypes 96%
- Mutational landscape of pure ductal carcinoma in situ and associations with disease prognosis and response to radiotherapy 96%
- Integrative multi-omic sequencing reveals the MMTV-Myc mouse model mimics human breast cancer heterogeneity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer: 2,094 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers 96%
- Pan-cancer analysis demonstrates that integrating polygenic risk scores with modifiable risk factors improves risk prediction 95%
- Whole-genome analysis of Nigerian patients with breast cancer reveals ethnic-driven somatic evolution and distinct genomic subtypes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The contribution of coding variants to the heritability of multiple cancer types using UK Biobank whole-exome sequencing data 95%
- Segregation analysis of 17,425 population-based breast cancer families: evidence for genetic susceptibility and risk prediction 95%
- A polygenic score-based approach to identify gene-drug interactions stratifying breast cancer risk 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of polygenic risk scores for cancer prediction in a racially diverse academic biobank 95%
- Evaluating the impact of modeling choices on the performance of integrated genetic and clinical models 90%
- Impact of genetic counselling strategy on diagnostic yield and workload for whole genome sequencing-based tumour diagnostics 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.