Back

Possible Multiple Origins Of Some Important Characteristics Of The Keel (Papilionate) Flowers Within Fabales

Aygoren Uluer, D.

2024-11-02 plant biology
10.1101/2024.10.29.621004 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Keel flowers are bilaterally symmetrical, pentamerous flowers with the reproductive organs enclosed by keel petals. Within Fabales, keel flowers are dominant in two species-rich lineages, tribe Polygaleae (Polygalaceae) and subfamily Fabaceae (Papilionoideae); however, independent events are also observed, such as in the genus Cercis. Before phylogenetic advancements were available (i.e., in contrast to more recent studies), most of the studies hypothesized a non-keeled origin for the Faboideae, although a detailed investigation has never been carried out. In this study, using the results of Aygoren Uluer et al. (2020, 2022a), the origin of some important morphological characters of the keel flower are examined, namely floral symmetry, perianth heteromorphism (i.e., three distinct petal/+sepal types), and the presence of enclosed reproductive organs. These characters are analysed within the Fabales using three different ancestral state analyses based on a phylogeny constructed for 678 taxa using published matK, rbcL and trnL plastid gene regions. The analyses show that symmetry probably originated in the (Fabaceae+Polygalaceae) clade, while the enclosed reproductive organs and three-types of petals appear to have evolved independently multiple times. Interestingly, not only the enclosed reproductive organs but also petal heteromorphism probably did not evolve in the MRCA of the Faboideae, but rather in a very early stage of the evolution of the subfamily. While future homology assessments and/or evolutionary developmental genetic (evo-devo) studies will be required to more clearly elucidate the evolutionary processes, the current study is the first attempt to investigate the origin of some important characteristics of keel flowers within order Fabales.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.1%
3
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
7
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
8
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
10
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
11
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
12
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
14
Plant Reproduction
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
17
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
18
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
20
Tree Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
Journal of Biosciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Plant And Cell Physiology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%