Drosophila melanogaster employs nuclear architecture for recruitment of dosage compensation
Sneideman, M. P. L.; Meller, V. H.
Show abstract
Drosophila melanogaster males increase expression from their single X chromosome to match the expression from two female X chromosomes. Increased expression involves recruitment of the Male Specific Lethal (MSL) complex to X-linked genes and modification of chromatin by this complex. How X-linked genes are selectively identified remains unclear, but cis-acting recruiting elements are involved. Chromatin Entry Sites (CES) bind an adapter protein that directly recruits the MSL complex. In addition, a class of AT-rich satellites, the 1.688X repeats, are enriched on the X and facilitate compensation of nearby genes. How these elements cooperate to identify the X is unknown. Nuclear architecture influences dosage compensation in many organisms. In this study we test the idea that factors involved in nuclear architecture participate in recruitment by the CES and 1.688X repeats. We find genetic interactions between mutations that reduce X recognition and factors that govern chromatin structure, silencing, remodeling and insulation, suggesting roles in X recognition. A reporter for recruitment revealed that Heterochromatin Protein 2 (HP2) and Scaffold Attachment Factor-A (SAF-A) disrupt compensation but do not selectively influence recruitment by either element. In contrast, Imitation switch (ISWI), D1 and Nucleoporin 153kD (Nup153) contribute to recruitment by the CES and Centrosomal protein 190kD (Cp190) exerts a striking influence on recruitment by 1.688X repeats. These findings reveal that recruitment by the CES and 1.688X repeats involves nuclear organization. We propose that the use of cis-acting elements that engage complementary aspects of nuclear organization ensures robust X recognition.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Insights Into Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) Dominance and Magnification Through Characterization of Isogenic Deletion Alleles 97%
- Catalytic activity of the Bin3/MEPCE methyltransferase domain is dispensable for 7SK snRNP function in Drosophila melanogaster 96%
- The Dream and MEC NuRD Complexes reinforce SPR-5/MET-2 maternal reprogramming to maintain the germline-soma distinction 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell RNA-sequencing reveals pre-meiotic X-chromosome dosage compensation in Drosophila testis 95%
- Cyclin B3 activates the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome in meiosis and mitosis 95%
- Mad1s ability to interact with Mad2 is essential to regulate and monitor meiotic synapsis in C. elegans 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Drosophila melanogaster ortholog of RFWD3 functions independently of RAD51 during DNA repair 96%
- Induction and inhibition of Drosophila X chromosome gene expression are both impeded by the dosage compensation complex 96%
- Mutator foci are regulated by developmental stage, RNA, and the germline cell cycle in Caenorhabditis elegans 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterologous synapsis in C. elegans is regulated by meiotic double-strand breaks and crossovers 95%
- shani mutation in mouse affects splicing of Spata22 and leads to impaired meiotic recombination 94%
- Using evolution as a tool: Replacing corolla in Drosophila melanogaster with its Drosophila mauritiana ortholog creates a novel hypomorphic allele 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.