Back

The relative effects of abiotic and biotic factors in explaining the structure of soil bacterial communities at diverse taxonomic levels

Mayjonade, B.; Zamar, R.; CARRERE, S.; Roux, F.

2024-11-03 ecology
10.1101/2024.10.29.620845 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Soil microbes play pivotal roles in the multifunctioning of terrestrial ecosystems. In the context of global changes, there is an urgent need to protect soil microbial diversity, which relies on determining the abiotic and biotic factors that influence the diversity, composition, and assemblage of soil microbiota. A large number of informative studies have reported edaphic properties and climate factors as key drivers of soil bacteria microbiota. However, these studies were mainly conducted at the phylum level and based on a restricted number of non-microbial variables. In this study, we aimed to estimate the relative effects of abiotic and biotic factors in shaping soil bacterial communities at diverse taxonomic levels by focusing on 160 natural sites located in the southwest of France for which a large and unique set of non-microbial variables is available. After characterizing soil bacterial communities with the highly taxonomically resolving gyrB gene, we identified that in addition to pH, temperature, and precipitations, soil bacterial communities at the lowest taxonomic levels appear strongly structured by soil micronutrients, notably manganese. On the other hand, soil bacterial communities at the highest taxonomic levels appear strongly structured by the interplay between descriptors of plant communities and edaphic properties. Similar to previous observations on microbial pathogens, the strong and positive associations between soil bacterial species and the presence of particular plant species suggest host specificity for soil commensal bacteria. Altogether, a deeper characterization of both abiotic and biotic factors could help fuel programs designed for protecting and restoring soil ecosystem functions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
4
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
6
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
15
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
17
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
20
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
29
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%