Mesial-to-lateral patterns of epileptiform activity identify the seizure onset zone in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
Aguila, C. A.; Lucas, A.; Lavelle, S.; Pattnaik, A. R.; Kim, J.; Ojemann, W. K. S.; Ma, D.; Josyula, M.; Petillo, N.; Larocque, J. J.; Sinha, S. R.; Ellis, C. A.; Parashos, A.; Gleichgerrcht, E.; Davis, K. A.; Litt, B.; Conrad, E. C.
Show abstract
Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) is a common localization of drug-resistant epilepsy in adults. Patients often undergo intracranial EEG (iEEG) monitoring to confirm localization and determine candidacy for focal ablation or resection. Clinicians primarily base surgical decision-making on seizure onset patterns, with imaging abnormalities and information from interictal epileptiform discharge (spikes) used as ancillary data. How the morphology and timing of spikes within multi-electrode sequences may inform surgical planning is unknown, in part due to the lack of measurement methods for large datasets. We hypothesized that patients with mTLE have a distinct mesial-to-lateral spike pattern that differentiates them from other epilepsy localizations. In a multicenter study at the University of Pennsylvania and the Medical University of South Carolina, we analyzed the timing and morphology of spikes and seizure high frequency energy ratio (HFER) in 75 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We compared these features across patients with mTLE, temporal neocortical epilepsy, and other localizations. A logistic regression model combining all features predicted a clinical localization of mTLE in unseen patients with an AUC of 0.82 (compared to an AUC of 0.70 for seizure-only features, DeLongs test p = 0.08). Spike rate was the most important feature in the combined model. Modeled probability of mTLE was similar between patients who had a good versus a poor 12-month outcome after undergoing a mesial temporal resection or ablation (p = 0.34). These findings support quantitative spike analysis to supplement analysis of seizures for use in surgical planning.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.