Primary Care Providers' Perspectives on Receiving Tier 1 Genomic Results from a National Study- the Million Veteran Program Return of Actionable Results (MVP-ROAR) Study
Johannsen, A. L.; Danowski, M. E.; Sitter, K. E.; Preys, C. L.; Gerety, H. C.; Brunette, C. A.; Christensen, K. D.; Gaziano, J. M.; Knowles, J. W.; Muralidhar, S.; Sturm, A. C.; Sun, Y. V.; Whitbourne, S. B.; Yi, T.; the Million Veteran Program, ; Vassy, J. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundPatients are increasingly obtaining genetic health information and integrating it into their care with the help of their primary care provider (PCP). However, PCPs may not be adequately prepared to effectively utilize genetic results . Across the VA health system, the Million Veteran Program-Return of Actionable Results-Familial Hypercholesterolemia (MVP-ROAR) study clinically confirms and returns genetic results associated with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), identified in a national biobank program. MethodsPCPs who received their patients genetic results through the MVP-ROAR Study were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews, which explored PCPs familiarity with FH, how the results impacted medical management, and suggestions for process improvement. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using directed content analysis and constant comparison methods to identify key themes. ResultsInterviews with nine PCPs revealed varied levels of familiarity with genetic testing and FH. Most PCPs did not distinguish FH from common high cholesterol issues and already used similar treatment approaches. Many PCPs did not recall receiving results from the MVP-ROAR Study. Alerts in medical records were deemed effective for communicating results. PCPs valued genetics in informing patient care and identifying at-risk family members but noted several implementation barriers, such as additional workload and unclear medical management benefits. Recommendations for improving results disclosure included simplifying the genetic testing report and associated support documents. ConclusionThe study represents the first investigation into PCPs experiences with receiving genetic test results from a biobank linked to a national healthcare system. Results suggest that PCPs generally view genetic testing as beneficial, though they may not significantly alter medical management. PCPs expressed that integrating genetics into routine care may be burdensome and require additional training, which may not be practical. The study underscores the need for accessible genetic information, which could be aided by specialized support roles or different clinical specialties assisting with incorporating genetic results into patient care.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 95%
- Using Coincidence Analysis to Identify Causal Chains of Factors Associated with Implementation and Optimization of Lynch Syndrome Tumor Screening Across Multiple Health care Systems 94%
- A Systematic Review of the Methodological Quality of Economic Evaluations in Genetic Screening and Testing for Monogenic Disorders 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Pooled Electronic Consultation Program to Improve Access to Genetics Specialists 95%
- Evaluation of DNA-poli: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess a digital platform for family cascade genetic testing and predictive genetic counselling 90%
- Early Diagnosis of Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Through AI-Powered Facial Analysis: Results from the Montalcino Aortic Consortium 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 95%
- Benefits and barriers to implementing precision preventive care: results of a national physician survey 95%
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors Influencing Precision Medicine Knowledge and Attitudes 94%
- Heterogeneity of Diagnosis and Documentation of Post-COVID Conditions in Primary Care: A Machine Learning Analysis 92%
- Assessing the impact of community-based interventions on hypertension and diabetes management in three Minnesota communities: findings from the prospective evaluation of US HealthRise programs 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Guided Precision Medicine Clinical Decision Support Tools: A Systematic Review 93%
- Development of Portable Electronic Health Record Based Algorithms to Identify Individuals with Diabetic Retinopathy 92%
- Clinical Implementation Of Preemptive Pharmacogenomics Testing For Personalized Medicine At An Academic Medical Center 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.